Civilizing the Barbarians? On the Apparent Necessity of Moral Surpluses

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter talks about civilizing the ‘barbarians’. These ‘barbarians’ are said to be students of business, management and economics who are said to be a generation completely different from the old protest generation of 1968 and so on. The chapter discusses some contemporary philosophical positions, which-except for the last one (K. Binmore)-argue that modern societies do indeed require a moral surplus to prevent human societies from destabilizing. The positions analyzed are the discourse ethics of J. Habermas, J. Rawls’ political liberalism, and K. Binmore’s game theory-based contractarianism. The chapter argues that the question whether the moral surplus can remain stable must be answered negatively in the cases of Habermas and Rawls. Habermas, in arguing for the importance of discourses as grounds for normative theory, makes a fundamental assumption: the participants of a discourse must allow their behaviour-at least partially-to be guided by a rational motivation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCorporate Citizenship, Contractarianism and Ethical Theory
Subtitle of host publicationOn Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages119-133
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781351160995
ISBN (Print)9781351161008
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Civilizing the Barbarians? On the Apparent Necessity of Moral Surpluses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this