TY - JOUR
T1 - Chiari malformation type I and basilar invagination originating from atlantoaxial instability
T2 - a literature review and critical analysis
AU - Wagner, Arthur
AU - Grassner, Lukas
AU - Kögl, Nikolaus
AU - Hartmann, Sebastian
AU - Thomé, Claudius
AU - Wostrack, Maria
AU - Meyer, Bernhard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Introduction: Recently, a novel hypothesis has been proposed concerning the origin of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) abnormalities. Commonly found in patients with these entities, atlantoaxial instability has been suspected to cause both Chiari malformation type I and basilar invagination, which renders the tried and tested surgical decompression strategy ineffective. In turn, C1-2 fusion is proposed as a single solution for all CVJ abnormalities, and a revised definition of atlantoaxial instability sees patients both with and without radiographic evidence of instability undergo fusion, instead relying on the intraoperative assessment of the atlantoaxial joints to confirm instability. Methods: The authors conducted a comprehensive narrative review of literature and evidence covering this recently emerged hypothesis. The proposed pathomechanisms are discussed and contextualized with published literature. Conclusion: The existing evidence is evaluated for supporting or opposing sole posterior C1-2 fusion in patients with CVJ abnormalities and compared with reported outcomes for conventional surgical strategies such as posterior fossa decompression, occipitocervical fusion, and anterior decompression. At present, there is insufficient evidence supporting the hypothesis of atlantoaxial instability being the common progenitor for CVJ abnormalities. Abolishing tried and tested surgical procedures in favor of a single universal approach would thus be unwarranted.
AB - Introduction: Recently, a novel hypothesis has been proposed concerning the origin of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) abnormalities. Commonly found in patients with these entities, atlantoaxial instability has been suspected to cause both Chiari malformation type I and basilar invagination, which renders the tried and tested surgical decompression strategy ineffective. In turn, C1-2 fusion is proposed as a single solution for all CVJ abnormalities, and a revised definition of atlantoaxial instability sees patients both with and without radiographic evidence of instability undergo fusion, instead relying on the intraoperative assessment of the atlantoaxial joints to confirm instability. Methods: The authors conducted a comprehensive narrative review of literature and evidence covering this recently emerged hypothesis. The proposed pathomechanisms are discussed and contextualized with published literature. Conclusion: The existing evidence is evaluated for supporting or opposing sole posterior C1-2 fusion in patients with CVJ abnormalities and compared with reported outcomes for conventional surgical strategies such as posterior fossa decompression, occipitocervical fusion, and anterior decompression. At present, there is insufficient evidence supporting the hypothesis of atlantoaxial instability being the common progenitor for CVJ abnormalities. Abolishing tried and tested surgical procedures in favor of a single universal approach would thus be unwarranted.
KW - Atlantoaxial fusion
KW - Atlantoaxial instability
KW - Basilar invagination
KW - C1-2 fusion
KW - Chiari malformation
KW - Syringomyelia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086127143&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00701-020-04429-z
DO - 10.1007/s00701-020-04429-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 32504118
AN - SCOPUS:85086127143
SN - 0001-6268
VL - 162
SP - 1553
EP - 1563
JO - Acta Neurochirurgica
JF - Acta Neurochirurgica
IS - 7
ER -