TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges of the newer generation of resorbable magnesium scaffolds
T2 - Lessons from failure mechanisms of the past generation
AU - Seguchi, Masaru
AU - Aytekin, Alp
AU - Lenz, Tobias
AU - Nicol, Philipp
AU - Alvarez-Covarrubias, Hector A.
AU - Xhepa, Erion
AU - Klosterman, Grace R.
AU - Beele, Alicia
AU - Sabic, Emina
AU - Utsch, Léa
AU - Alyaqoob, Aseel
AU - Joner, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were developed to overcome the obstacles of metallic stents, mostly related to sustained presence of metallic foreign body in the coronary vessel. Following earlier success of single-arm BRS studies, randomized controlled trials of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) showed poor long-term clinical outcomes, particularly in terms of scaffold thrombosis. BRS made from magnesium alloy provide a promising alternative in terms of radial force, strut thickness and, potentially lower thrombogenicity. A recent clinical study demonstrated that magnesium-based BRS seems to be promising with regards to the risk of scaffold thrombosis. In this review, our aim is to describe the issues that prevented Absorb BVS from achieving favorable outcomes, provide current status of existing BRS technologies and the challenges that newer generation BRSs need to overcome, and the results of clinical studies for commercially available magnesium-based BRS, which remain the only BRS actively studied in clinical practice.
AB - Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were developed to overcome the obstacles of metallic stents, mostly related to sustained presence of metallic foreign body in the coronary vessel. Following earlier success of single-arm BRS studies, randomized controlled trials of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) showed poor long-term clinical outcomes, particularly in terms of scaffold thrombosis. BRS made from magnesium alloy provide a promising alternative in terms of radial force, strut thickness and, potentially lower thrombogenicity. A recent clinical study demonstrated that magnesium-based BRS seems to be promising with regards to the risk of scaffold thrombosis. In this review, our aim is to describe the issues that prevented Absorb BVS from achieving favorable outcomes, provide current status of existing BRS technologies and the challenges that newer generation BRSs need to overcome, and the results of clinical studies for commercially available magnesium-based BRS, which remain the only BRS actively studied in clinical practice.
KW - Bioresorbable scaffold
KW - Coronary artery disease
KW - Magnesium alloy
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Stent thrombosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138764726&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.09.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.09.003
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36122642
AN - SCOPUS:85138764726
SN - 0914-5087
VL - 81
SP - 179
EP - 188
JO - Journal of Cardiology
JF - Journal of Cardiology
IS - 2
ER -