Cerebral autoregulation in awake versus isoflurane-anesthetized rats

W. E. Hoffman, G. Edelman, E. Kochs, C. Werner, L. Segil, R. F. Albrecht

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

96 Scopus citations

Abstract

We evaluated regional cerebral and spinal cord blood flow in rats during isoflurane anesthesia. Tissue blood flow was measured in cerebral cortex, subcortex, midbrain, and spinal cord using radioactive microspheres. Blood flow autoregulation was measured within the following arterial blood pressure ranges (mm Hg): 1 = <50, 2 = 50-90, 3 = 90-130, 4 = 130-170, 5 = >170. Arterial blood pressure was increased using phenylephrine infusion and decreased with ganglionic blockade and hemorrhage. Three treatment groups were studied: 1 = awake control, 2 = 1.0 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAG) isoflurane, 3 = 2.0 MAG isoflurane. Autoregulation was seen in awake rats from 50 to 170 mm Hg in all tissues. The autoregulatory coefficient (change in blood flow/change in blood pressure) was increased in midbrain and spinal cord during 1.0 MAC isoflurane and in all tissues during 2.0 MAG isoflurane (P < 0.05). Within the arterial blood pressure range of 90-130 mm Hg, isoflurane produced the following changes in tissue blood flow (percent of awake control): 1.0 MAG isoflurane: cortex = 87% ± 8% (P > 0.30), subcortex = 124% ± 11% (P > 0.05), midbrain = 263% ± 20% (P < 0.001), spinal cord = 278% ± 19% (P < 0.001); 2.0 MAC isoflurane: cortex = 137% ± 13% (P < 0.05), subcortex = 272% ± 24% (P < 0.001), midbrain = 510% ± 53% (P < 0.001), spinal cord = 535% ± 50% (P < 0.001). These results show that isoflurane produces dose-dependent cerebral vasodilation and loss of autoregulation which is regionally specific.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)753-757
Number of pages5
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cerebral autoregulation in awake versus isoflurane-anesthetized rats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this