TY - JOUR
T1 - Carotid Ultrasound Boundary Study (CUBS)
T2 - An Open Multicenter Analysis of Computerized Intima–Media Thickness Measurement Systems and Their Clinical Impact
AU - Meiburger, Kristen M.
AU - Zahnd, Guillaume
AU - Faita, Francesco
AU - Loizou, Christos P.
AU - Carvalho, Catarina
AU - Steinman, David A.
AU - Gibello, Lorenzo
AU - Bruno, Rosa Maria
AU - Marzola, Francesco
AU - Clarenbach, Ricarda
AU - Francesconi, Martina
AU - Nicolaides, Andrew N.
AU - Campilho, Aurelio
AU - Ghotbi, Reza
AU - Kyriacou, Efthyvoulos
AU - Navab, Nassir
AU - Griffin, Maura
AU - Panayiotou, Andrie G.
AU - Gherardini, Rachele
AU - Varetto, Gianfranco
AU - Bianchini, Elisabetta
AU - Pattichis, Constantinos S.
AU - Ghiadoni, Lorenzo
AU - Rouco, José
AU - Molinari, Filippo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Common carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) is a commonly used marker for atherosclerosis and is often computed in carotid ultrasound images. An analysis of different computerized techniques for CIMT measurement and their clinical impacts on the same patient data set is lacking. Here we compared and assessed five computerized CIMT algorithms against three expert analysts’ manual measurements on a data set of 1088 patients from two centers. Inter- and intra-observer variability was assessed, and the computerized CIMT values were compared with those manually obtained. The CIMT measurements were used to assess the correlation with clinical parameters, cardiovascular event prediction through a generalized linear model and the Kaplan–Meier hazard ratio. CIMT measurements obtained with a skilled analyst's segmentation and the computerized segmentation were comparable in statistical analyses, suggesting they can be used interchangeably for CIMT quantification and clinical outcome investigation. To facilitate future studies, the entire data set used is made publicly available for the community at http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/fpv535fss7.1.
AB - Common carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) is a commonly used marker for atherosclerosis and is often computed in carotid ultrasound images. An analysis of different computerized techniques for CIMT measurement and their clinical impacts on the same patient data set is lacking. Here we compared and assessed five computerized CIMT algorithms against three expert analysts’ manual measurements on a data set of 1088 patients from two centers. Inter- and intra-observer variability was assessed, and the computerized CIMT values were compared with those manually obtained. The CIMT measurements were used to assess the correlation with clinical parameters, cardiovascular event prediction through a generalized linear model and the Kaplan–Meier hazard ratio. CIMT measurements obtained with a skilled analyst's segmentation and the computerized segmentation were comparable in statistical analyses, suggesting they can be used interchangeably for CIMT quantification and clinical outcome investigation. To facilitate future studies, the entire data set used is made publicly available for the community at http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/fpv535fss7.1.
KW - Atherosclerosis
KW - Cardiovascular events
KW - Carotid artery intima–media thickness
KW - Open-source database
KW - Segmentation
KW - Ultrasound imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105039218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.022
DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 33941415
AN - SCOPUS:85105039218
SN - 0301-5629
VL - 47
SP - 2442
EP - 2455
JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
IS - 8
ER -