TY - JOUR
T1 - Caring for nature matters
T2 - a relational approach for understanding nature's contributions to human well-being
AU - Jax, Kurt
AU - Calestani, Melania
AU - Chan, Kai MA
AU - Eser, Uta
AU - Keune, Hans
AU - Muraca, Barbara
AU - O'Brien, Liz
AU - Potthast, Thomas
AU - Voget-Kleschin, Lieske
AU - Wittmer, Heidi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Ecosystem services frameworks effectively assume that nature's contributions to human well-being derive from people receiving benefits from nature. At the same time, efforts (money, time, or energy) for conservation, restoration or stewardship are often considered costs to be minimized. But what if caring for nature is itself an essential component of human well-being? Taking up and developing the concept of relational values, we explore the idea that well-being cannot be reduced to the reception of benefits, and that instead much derives from positive agency including caring for nature. In this paper, we ask specifically, first, how can ‘care’ be conceptualized with respect to nature, second, how does caring for nature matter both to protecting nature and to people's well-being, and third, what are the implications for research and practice? We describe the theoretical background, drawing especially from (eco)feminist philosophy, and explore its (mostly) implicit uses in the conservation literature. Based on this analysis we propose a preliminary framework of caring for nature and discuss its potential to enrich the spectrum of moral relations to/with nature. We explore both its consequences for environmental research and for the practice of conservation.
AB - Ecosystem services frameworks effectively assume that nature's contributions to human well-being derive from people receiving benefits from nature. At the same time, efforts (money, time, or energy) for conservation, restoration or stewardship are often considered costs to be minimized. But what if caring for nature is itself an essential component of human well-being? Taking up and developing the concept of relational values, we explore the idea that well-being cannot be reduced to the reception of benefits, and that instead much derives from positive agency including caring for nature. In this paper, we ask specifically, first, how can ‘care’ be conceptualized with respect to nature, second, how does caring for nature matter both to protecting nature and to people's well-being, and third, what are the implications for research and practice? We describe the theoretical background, drawing especially from (eco)feminist philosophy, and explore its (mostly) implicit uses in the conservation literature. Based on this analysis we propose a preliminary framework of caring for nature and discuss its potential to enrich the spectrum of moral relations to/with nature. We explore both its consequences for environmental research and for the practice of conservation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056179681&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85056179681
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 35
SP - 22
EP - 29
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
ER -