TY - GEN
T1 - Calculation of sub-surface-initiated fatigue fractures in gears
AU - Müller, Daniel
AU - Tobie, Thomas
AU - Stahl, Karsten
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © COMPLAS 2019.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Power-transmitting gears are typically heat-treated, most often case-hardened, to improve the fatigue strength and therefore to ensure higher fatigue life. The heat treatment causes higher hardness in the surface area as well as compressive residual stresses in the hardened layer. The near-surface compressive residual stresses are compensated by tensile stresses in higher depths of the gear volume. Pitting and tooth root breakage are the most common failure modes of gears, which are well researched and are also addressed in ISO 6336 [14]. The assessment of these failure modes provides the basis for the dimensioning of gears in the design phase. However, subsurface-initiated failures, like tooth flank fracture (TFF), can also appear at loads below the allowable level of loading for pitting and tooth root bending. TFF is a fatigue damage with crack initiation in the region of the transition between compressive and tensile residual stresses and usually leads to a total loss of drive. The existing calculation models for fatigue strength of gears with regard to TFF consider residual stresses differently. The base of the investigated calculation models is a local comparison of the occurring stresses and the strength value in the gear volume. The outcome of the calculation model from Oster [26] is highly influenced by the residual stress state. However, the material-physical model by Hertter [10] is more tolerant to slightly varying residual stresses. Further approaches such as Weber [34] and Konowalcyk [18] are based on the ideas of Oster and Hertter. The verification of the models is complicated due to the lack of residual stress measurements in larger depths under the gear flank surface. For example, residual stress measurement by X-ray diffraction is only possible up to depths of approximately one millimeter. Therefore, tensile residual stresses in the inner tooth volume are considered zero in the common residual stresses calculation of Lang [19] and are not considered in the current calculation approach of ISO/DTS 6336-4 [15]. The paper describes local calculation approaches for the fatigue strength of gears with different consideration of residual stresses. Furthermore, the crack initiation point, which is mandatory for the validation of an approach, is examined. The failure mode TFF is hereby the key.
AB - Power-transmitting gears are typically heat-treated, most often case-hardened, to improve the fatigue strength and therefore to ensure higher fatigue life. The heat treatment causes higher hardness in the surface area as well as compressive residual stresses in the hardened layer. The near-surface compressive residual stresses are compensated by tensile stresses in higher depths of the gear volume. Pitting and tooth root breakage are the most common failure modes of gears, which are well researched and are also addressed in ISO 6336 [14]. The assessment of these failure modes provides the basis for the dimensioning of gears in the design phase. However, subsurface-initiated failures, like tooth flank fracture (TFF), can also appear at loads below the allowable level of loading for pitting and tooth root bending. TFF is a fatigue damage with crack initiation in the region of the transition between compressive and tensile residual stresses and usually leads to a total loss of drive. The existing calculation models for fatigue strength of gears with regard to TFF consider residual stresses differently. The base of the investigated calculation models is a local comparison of the occurring stresses and the strength value in the gear volume. The outcome of the calculation model from Oster [26] is highly influenced by the residual stress state. However, the material-physical model by Hertter [10] is more tolerant to slightly varying residual stresses. Further approaches such as Weber [34] and Konowalcyk [18] are based on the ideas of Oster and Hertter. The verification of the models is complicated due to the lack of residual stress measurements in larger depths under the gear flank surface. For example, residual stress measurement by X-ray diffraction is only possible up to depths of approximately one millimeter. Therefore, tensile residual stresses in the inner tooth volume are considered zero in the common residual stresses calculation of Lang [19] and are not considered in the current calculation approach of ISO/DTS 6336-4 [15]. The paper describes local calculation approaches for the fatigue strength of gears with different consideration of residual stresses. Furthermore, the crack initiation point, which is mandatory for the validation of an approach, is examined. The failure mode TFF is hereby the key.
KW - Gears
KW - Load Carrying Capacity
KW - Residual Stresses
KW - Tooth Flank Fracture
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85101988166
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85101988166
T3 - 15th International Conference on Computational Plasticity. Fundamentals and Applications, COMPLAS 2019
SP - 189
EP - 200
BT - 15th International Conference on Computational Plasticity. Fundamentals and Applications, COMPLAS 2019
A2 - Onate, Eugenio
A2 - Owen, D. Roger J.
A2 - Peric, Djordje
A2 - Chiumenti, Michele
A2 - de Souza Neto, Eduardo
PB - International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering
T2 - 15th International Conference on Computational Plasticity. Fundamentals and Applications, COMPLAS 2019
Y2 - 3 September 2019 through 5 September 2019
ER -