Brief Use of Behavioral Activation Features Predicts Benefits of Self-Help App on Depression Symptoms: Secondary Analysis of a Selective Prevention Trial in Young People

Emily Bralee, Mohammod Mostazir, Fiona C. Warren, Alexandra Newbold, Claire Hulme, Timothy Cranston, Benjamin Aas, Holly Bear, Cristina Botella, Felix Burkhardt, Thomas Ehring, Mina Fazel, Johnny R.J. Fontaine, Mads Frost, Azucena Garcia-Palacios, Ellen Greimel, Christiane Hößle, Arpine Hovasapian, Veerle E.I. Huyghe, Nanna IversenKostas Karpouzis, Johanna Löchner, Guadalupe Molinari, Reinhard Pekrun, Belinda Platt, Tabea Rosenkranz, Klaus R. Scherer, Katja Schlegel, Bjorn W. Schuller, Gerd Schulte-Korne, Carlos Suso-Ribera, Varinka Voigt, Maria Voss, Edward R. Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To explore which cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) self-help app usage predicted depression during a selective prevention trial. Method: A recent controlled trial (ECoWeB-PREVENT) randomized young people aged 16-22, at increased risk for depression because of elevated worry/rumination, negative appraisals, and/or rejection sensitivity but without past or current history of major depression, to apps that provided self-monitoring, self-monitoring plus CBT self-help, or self-monitoring plus emotional competency self-help. Self-help included coping strategies for moment-by-moment use (Tools) and self-learning/planning exercises (Challenges). On the primary outcome (depression, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) at 3-months follow-up (primary endpoint), only the CBT app outperformed selfmonitoring. In this secondary analysis, only data from participants who used the CBT or self-monitoring apps at least once were analyzed to test what app use predicted change in depression from baseline to 3 months. Results: Of the original 1,262 participants (79% female), 558 were included (CBT, baseline, n = 273, PHQ-9: M = 7.48, SD = 3.9; 3 months, N = 163, PHQ-9: M = 8.83, SD = 4.92; self-monitoring, baseline, n = 285, PHQ-9: M = 7.45, SD = 4.26; 3 months, N = 183, PHQ-9: M = 7.48, SD = 3.9). Neither total app use, self-monitoring, nor use of Tools predicted change in depression (all ps?> .05). Frequency of use of Challenges predicted lower depression symptoms and caseness at 3 months (p = -0.28, 95% CI [-0.53, -0.03], p = .029). Specifically, the use of behavioral activation challenges mediated the effects of the CBT app on depression over3 months (p = -0.59,95% CI [-1.13, -0.05],p = .03). Conclusions: Brief psychoeducation about behavioral activation principles in an app may protect young people from depression over 3 months, even when only used once.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-306
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Volume93
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • behavioral activation
  • cognitive behavioral therapy
  • depression
  • smartphone app
  • young people

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brief Use of Behavioral Activation Features Predicts Benefits of Self-Help App on Depression Symptoms: Secondary Analysis of a Selective Prevention Trial in Young People'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this