Breite Einwilligung (broad consent) zur Biobank-Forschung – die ethische Debatte

Gesine Richter; Alena Buyx

doi:10.1007/s00481-016-0398-4

Breite Einwilligung (broad consent) zur Biobank-Forschung – die ethische Debatte

Translated title of the contribution: Broad consent for biobank-research – the ethical debate

Gesine Richter, Alena Buyx

Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Definition of the problem: Ethical aspects of biobanking research are receiving increasing attention in the literature. It is particularly controversial which model of consent should be implemented in research biobanks. Arguments: This paper outlines the ethical controversy surrounding various models of consent into biobank-based research. Following a brief introduction of established consent models, it delineates the development of alternative approaches and discusses the ethical and regulatory challenges associated with these. Relevant ethical principles are highlighted. Conclusion: The article concludes that there are good reasons to trial a combination of initial broad consent with consent to governance for future biobanking research in Germany.

Translated title of the contribution	Broad consent for biobank-research – the ethical debate
Original language	German
Pages (from-to)	311-325
Number of pages	15
Journal	Ethik in der Medizin
Volume	28
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-016-0398-4
State	Published - 1 Dec 2016
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/s00481-016-0398-4

Cite this

@article{74c32c552fec42cdac418b926598ab50,

title = "Breite Einwilligung (broad consent) zur Biobank-Forschung – die ethische Debatte",

abstract = "Definition of the problem: Ethical aspects of biobanking research are receiving increasing attention in the literature. It is particularly controversial which model of consent should be implemented in research biobanks. Arguments: This paper outlines the ethical controversy surrounding various models of consent into biobank-based research. Following a brief introduction of established consent models, it delineates the development of alternative approaches and discusses the ethical and regulatory challenges associated with these. Relevant ethical principles are highlighted. Conclusion: The article concludes that there are good reasons to trial a combination of initial broad consent with consent to governance for future biobanking research in Germany.",

keywords = "Biobanking, Broad consent, Informed consent, Research biobanks",

author = "Gesine Richter and Alena Buyx",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.",

year = "2016",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s00481-016-0398-4",

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "28",

pages = "311--325",

journal = "Ethik in der Medizin",

issn = "0935-7335",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Breite Einwilligung (broad consent) zur Biobank-Forschung – die ethische Debatte

AU - Richter, Gesine

AU - Buyx, Alena

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Definition of the problem: Ethical aspects of biobanking research are receiving increasing attention in the literature. It is particularly controversial which model of consent should be implemented in research biobanks. Arguments: This paper outlines the ethical controversy surrounding various models of consent into biobank-based research. Following a brief introduction of established consent models, it delineates the development of alternative approaches and discusses the ethical and regulatory challenges associated with these. Relevant ethical principles are highlighted. Conclusion: The article concludes that there are good reasons to trial a combination of initial broad consent with consent to governance for future biobanking research in Germany.

AB - Definition of the problem: Ethical aspects of biobanking research are receiving increasing attention in the literature. It is particularly controversial which model of consent should be implemented in research biobanks. Arguments: This paper outlines the ethical controversy surrounding various models of consent into biobank-based research. Following a brief introduction of established consent models, it delineates the development of alternative approaches and discusses the ethical and regulatory challenges associated with these. Relevant ethical principles are highlighted. Conclusion: The article concludes that there are good reasons to trial a combination of initial broad consent with consent to governance for future biobanking research in Germany.

KW - Biobanking

KW - Broad consent

KW - Informed consent

KW - Research biobanks

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84978764160

U2 - 10.1007/s00481-016-0398-4

DO - 10.1007/s00481-016-0398-4

M3 - Artikel

AN - SCOPUS:84978764160

SN - 0935-7335

VL - 28

SP - 311

EP - 325

JO - Ethik in der Medizin

JF - Ethik in der Medizin

IS - 4

ER -

Breite Einwilligung (broad consent) zur Biobank-Forschung – die ethische Debatte

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this