Bivalirudin vs. unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris: 1-year results of the ISAR-REACT 3 trial

Aims In ISAR-REACT 3, 30-day outcomes in 4570 biomarker negative patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ≥2 h after pre-treatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel revealed less bleeding with bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin, but no difference in 30-day net clinical benefit. The objective of the present analysis was to assess the impact of bivalirudin vs. heparin on 1-year outcomes in ISAR-REACT 3.Methods and resultsThe primary outcome for this analysis was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization 1 year after randomization. The composite of death or myocardial infarction was a secondary outcome. At 1 year, the primary outcome occurred in 17.1 of patients assigned to bivalirudin vs. 17.5 assigned to heparin [hazard ratio (HR), 0.98; 95 confidence interval (CI), 0.86-1.13; P = 0.816]. The combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction was 7.7 in the bivalirudin group vs. 6.7 in the heparin group (HR, 1.15; 95 CI, 0.93-1.43; P = 0.200). The mortality rate was 1.9 in the bivalirudin group and 1.7 in the heparin group (HR, 1.10; 95 CI, 0.71-1.70; P = 0.667). At 1 year, no significant differences in the primary outcome were observed with bivalirudin and heparin in any of the subgroups analysed.ConclusionBivalirudin and unfractionated heparin during PCI provide comparable outcomes at 1 year in biomarker negative patients undergoing PCI after pre-treatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel.Clinical trial registration information: URL www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier NCT00262054.