Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention

  • Adnan Kastrati
  • , Franz Josef Neumann
  • , Julinda Mehilli
  • , Robert A. Byrne
  • , Raisuke Iijima
  • , Heinz Joachim Büttner
  • , Ahmed A. Khattab
  • , Stefanie Schulz
  • , James C. Blankenship
  • , Jürgen Pache
  • , Jan Minners
  • , Melchior Seyfarth
  • , Isolde Graf
  • , Kimberly A. Skelding
  • , Josef Dirschinger
  • , Gert Richardt
  • , Peter B. Berger
  • , Albert Schömig
  • University Heart Center Freiburg
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Herzzentrum Segeberger Kliniken
  • Weis Center for Research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

336 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether bivalirudin is superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with stable or unstable angina who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pretreatment with clopidogrel is unknown. METHODS: We enrolled 4570 patients with stable or unstable angina (with normal levels of troponin T and creatine kinase MB) who were undergoing PCI after pretreatment with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel at least 2 hours before the procedure; 2289 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive bivalirudin, and 2281 to receive unfractionated heparin. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization due to myocardial ischemia within 30 days after randomization, or major bleeding during the index hospitalization (with a net clinical benefit defined as a reduction in the incidence of the end point). The secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target-vessel revascularization. RESULTS: The incidence of the primary end point was 8.3% (190 patients) in the bivalirudin group as compared with 8.7% (199 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.15; P = 0.57). The secondary end point occurred in 134 patients (5.9%) in the bivalirudin group and 115 patients (5.0%) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.49; P = 0.23). The incidence of major bleeding was 3.1% (70 patients) in the bivalirudin group and 4.6% (104 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable and unstable angina who underwent PCI after pretreatment with clopidogrel, bivalirudin did not provide a net clinical benefit (i.e., it did not reduce the incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization, or major bleeding) as compared with unfractionated heparin, but it did significantly reduce the incidence of major bleeding. (ClinicalTrials. gov number, NCT00262054.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)688-696
Number of pages9
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume359
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 14 Aug 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this