Biomechanical Effect of Superior Capsule Reconstruction Using a 3-mm and 6-mm Thick Acellular Dermal Allograft in a Dynamic Shoulder Model

  • Bastian Scheiderer
  • , Cameron Kia
  • , Elifho Obopilwe
  • , Jeremiah D. Johnson
  • , Mark P. Cote
  • , Florian B. Imhoff
  • , Felix Dyrna
  • , Knut Beitzel
  • , Andreas B. Imhoff
  • , Christopher R. Adams
  • , Augustus D. Mazzocca
  • , Daichi Morikawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

64 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To biomechanically compare the effect of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using a 3- and 6-mm thick acellular dermal allograft for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using a dynamic shoulder model. Maximum abduction angle (MAA), glenohumeral superior translation (ghST), subacromial peak contact pressure (sPCP), and cumulative deltoid force (cDF) were compared among 4 conditions: (1) intact shoulder, (2) simulated irreparable rotator cuff tear (RCT), (3) SCR using a 3-mm-thick acellular dermal allograft, (4) SCR using a 6-mm-thick acellular dermal allograft. Results: Compared with the intact state, simulated irreparable RCTs significantly decreased MAA (P < .001), while significantly increasing ghST (P = .001), sPCP (P < .001), and cDF (P < .001). SCR with a 3-mm-thick graft significantly increased MAA (P = .01) and decreased ghST (P = .01) compared with the RCT state, however, showed similar sPCP and cDF. Compared with the torn state, SCR with a 6-mm-thick graft significantly increased MAA (P < .001) and significantly decreased ghST (P < .001), sPCP (P < .001), and cDF (P = .001). Using a 6-mm-thick graft demonstrated similar MAA, ghST, sPCP, and cDF compared with the intact state. When comparing the 3-mm to the 6-mm thick graft, significant differences were found in ghST (P = .03), sPCP (P < .001), and cDF (P = .02). Conclusions: SCR with a 6-mm-thick acellular dermal allograft better restored normal glenohumeral joint position and forces compared with a 3-mm-thick graft for the treatment of irreparable RCTs. Clinical Relevance: Graft thickness may affect the clinical success following SCR with commercially available dermal allografts. Using a thicker (>3 mm) graft was able to biomechanically better restore native glenohumeral joint properties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-364
Number of pages10
JournalArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biomechanical Effect of Superior Capsule Reconstruction Using a 3-mm and 6-mm Thick Acellular Dermal Allograft in a Dynamic Shoulder Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this