Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Biomechanical comparison of lower trapezius and latissimus dorsi transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears using a dynamic shoulder model

  • Lukas N. Muench
  • , Daniel P. Berthold
  • , Cameron Kia
  • , Elifho Obopilwe
  • , Mark P. Cote
  • , Andreas B. Imhoff
  • , Bastian Scheiderer
  • , Bassem T. Elhassan
  • , Knut Beitzel
  • , Augustus D. Mazzocca
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Univ. of Connecticut Health Center
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • ATOS Clinic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: In the setting of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (PSRCTs), lower trapezius transfer (LTT) may be anatomically better positioned for restoring the muscular force couple compared with latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of LTT and LDT on glenohumeral kinematics using a dynamic shoulder model. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (mean age: 56.5 ± 17.2 years) were tested using a dynamic shoulder simulator. The maximum abduction angle (MAA), superior humeral head migration (SHM), and cumulative deltoid forces (CDFs) were compared across 4 conditions: (1) native; (2) irreparable PSRCT; (3) LTT using an Achilles tendon allograft; and (4) LDT. MAA and SHM were measured using 3-dimensional motion tracking. CDF was recorded in real time throughout the dynamic abduction motion by load cells connected to actuators. Results: Compared to the native state, the PSRCT resulted in a significant decrease (Δ–24.1°; P < .001) in MAA, with a subsequent significant increase after LTT (Δ13.1°; P < .001) and LDT (Δ8.9°; P < .001). LTT achieved a significantly greater MAA than LDT (Δ4.2°; P = .004). Regarding SHM, both LTT (Δ–9.4 mm; P < .001) and LDT (Δ–5.0 mm; P = .008) demonstrated a significant decrease compared with the PSRCT state. LTT also achieved significantly less SHM compared with the LDT (Δ–4.4 mm; P = .011). Further, only the LTT resulted in a significant decrease in CDF compared with the PSRCT state (Δ–21.3 N; P = .048), whereas LTT and LDT showed similar CDF (Δ–11.3 N; P = .346). However, no technique was able to restore the MAA, SHM, and CDF of the native shoulder (P < .001, respectively). Conclusion: LTT and LDT both achieved a significant increase in MAA along with significantly less SHM compared with the PSRCT state. Although LTT required significantly less compensatory deltoid forces compared with the PSRCT state, this was not observed for the LDT. Further, the LTT prevented loss of abduction motion and SHM more sufficiently. In the challenging treatment of irreparable PSRCTs, LTT may restore native glenohumeral kinematics more sufficiently, potentially leading to improved postoperative functional outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2392-2401
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume31
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Basic Science Study
  • Biomechanics
  • Lower trapezius transfer
  • glenohumeral joint
  • latissimus dorsi transfer
  • posterosuperior rotator cuff tear
  • shoulder simulator
  • tendon transfer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biomechanical comparison of lower trapezius and latissimus dorsi transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears using a dynamic shoulder model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this