Biological monitoring of welders exposed to aluminium

Bernd Rossbach, Mark Buchta, György A. Csanády, Johannes G. Filser, Wolfgang Hilla, Klaus Windorfer, Joachim Stork, Wolfgang Zschiesche, Olaf Gefeller, Annette Pfahlberg, Karl Heinz Schaller, Ellen Egerer, Luis Carlos Escobar Pinzón, Stephan Letzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

To evaluate an adequate strategy for biological monitoring of aluminium (Al), a group of 62 Al welders (age in 1999: 23-51 years, median 35 years) was surveyed annually from 1999 to 2003 by determination of pre- and post-shift Al in urine and plasma. Biomonitoring was supplemented by personal air measurements of the total dust concentration. The welders' internal exposure was compared to the exposure of 60 non-exposed assembly workers (age in 1999: 21-51 years, median: 36 years) who were surveyed in 1999, 2001 and 2003. Having a nearly constant dust exposure, median concentrations of Al in urine (Al in plasma) of the welders decreased from 40.1 μg/g to 19.8 μg/g creatinine (8.7 to 4.6 μg/l). For the control group the median levels of Al in urine (plasma) ranged from 4.8 μg/g to 5.2 μg/g creatinine (2.4-4.3 μg/l) indicating a higher sensitivity for the marker Al in urine. No systematic differences have been found between pre- and post-shift internal exposure. This might be caused by the slow elimination kinetics and low systemic bioavailability of Al. A correlation analysis did not yield close relationships between dust exposure, Al in plasma and Al in urine underlining the importance of biomonitoring for assessment of Al exposure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-245
Number of pages7
JournalToxicology Letters
Volume162
Issue number2-3 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Apr 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aluminium
  • Aluminium welders
  • Biomonitoring
  • Welding fumes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biological monitoring of welders exposed to aluminium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this