TY - JOUR
T1 - Benchmark of GW Approaches for the GW100 Test Set
AU - Caruso, Fabio
AU - Dauth, Matthias
AU - Van Setten, Michiel J.
AU - Rinke, Patrick
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2016/10/11
Y1 - 2016/10/11
N2 - For the recent GW100 test set of molecular ionization energies, we present a comprehensive assessment of different GW methodologies: fully self-consistent GW (scGW), quasiparticle self-consistent GW (qsGW), partially self-consistent GW0 (scGW0), perturbative GW (G0W0), and optimized G0W0 based on the minimization of the deviation from the straight-line error (DSLE-min GW). We compare our GW calculations to coupled-cluster singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] reference data for GW100. We find scGW and qsGW ionization energies in excellent agreement with CCSD(T), with discrepancies typically smaller than 0.3 eV (scGW) and 0.2 eV (qsGW), respectively. For scGW0 and G0W0 the deviation from CCSD(T) is strongly dependent on the starting point. We further relate the discrepancy between the GW ionization energies and CCSD(T) to the deviation from straight line error (DSLE). In DSLE-minimized GW calculations, the DSLE is significantly reduced, yielding a systematic improvement in the description of the ionization energies.
AB - For the recent GW100 test set of molecular ionization energies, we present a comprehensive assessment of different GW methodologies: fully self-consistent GW (scGW), quasiparticle self-consistent GW (qsGW), partially self-consistent GW0 (scGW0), perturbative GW (G0W0), and optimized G0W0 based on the minimization of the deviation from the straight-line error (DSLE-min GW). We compare our GW calculations to coupled-cluster singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] reference data for GW100. We find scGW and qsGW ionization energies in excellent agreement with CCSD(T), with discrepancies typically smaller than 0.3 eV (scGW) and 0.2 eV (qsGW), respectively. For scGW0 and G0W0 the deviation from CCSD(T) is strongly dependent on the starting point. We further relate the discrepancy between the GW ionization energies and CCSD(T) to the deviation from straight line error (DSLE). In DSLE-minimized GW calculations, the DSLE is significantly reduced, yielding a systematic improvement in the description of the ionization energies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991377785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00774
DO - 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00774
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84991377785
SN - 1549-9618
VL - 12
SP - 5076
EP - 5087
JO - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
JF - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
IS - 10
ER -