TY - JOUR
T1 - Benchmark of automated machine learning with state-of-the-art image segmentation algorithms for tool condition monitoring
AU - Lutz, B.
AU - Reisch, R.
AU - Kisskalt, D.
AU - Avci, B.
AU - Regulin, D.
AU - Knoll, A.
AU - Franke, J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the FAIM 2021.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In condition monitoring of cutting inserts for machine tools, vision-based solutions enable detailed wear pattern analysis. Besides the main failure modes of flank wear and tool breakage, other defects, such as chipping, grooves, and build-up-edges, can be detected and quantified. However, manual analysis of the images is time consuming and traditional machine vision systems have limited capabilities adapting to changing situations, such as different insert types. As a result, robust machine learning techniques are researched to support the process of classifying images and detecting defects through image segmentation. For the latter, a variety of highly optimized networks exists. Still, these networks require tuning by machine learning experts. In contrast, automated machine learning is a recent trend that greatly reduces these efforts through automated network selection and hyperparameter optimization. In this study, automated machine learning is compared with manually trained segmentation networks on the example of tool condition monitoring. To achieve this, a heterogeneous dataset of over 200 industrial cutting tool images is recorded and evaluated. Comparing the manually trained segmentation networks to the automated machine learning framework, it is determined that the automated machine learning solution is easier to handle, faster to train and achieves better accuracies than other approaches.
AB - In condition monitoring of cutting inserts for machine tools, vision-based solutions enable detailed wear pattern analysis. Besides the main failure modes of flank wear and tool breakage, other defects, such as chipping, grooves, and build-up-edges, can be detected and quantified. However, manual analysis of the images is time consuming and traditional machine vision systems have limited capabilities adapting to changing situations, such as different insert types. As a result, robust machine learning techniques are researched to support the process of classifying images and detecting defects through image segmentation. For the latter, a variety of highly optimized networks exists. Still, these networks require tuning by machine learning experts. In contrast, automated machine learning is a recent trend that greatly reduces these efforts through automated network selection and hyperparameter optimization. In this study, automated machine learning is compared with manually trained segmentation networks on the example of tool condition monitoring. To achieve this, a heterogeneous dataset of over 200 industrial cutting tool images is recorded and evaluated. Comparing the manually trained segmentation networks to the automated machine learning framework, it is determined that the automated machine learning solution is easier to handle, faster to train and achieves better accuracies than other approaches.
KW - Automated machine learning
KW - Image segmentation
KW - Machine learning
KW - Tool condition monitoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099799652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.031
DO - 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.031
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85099799652
SN - 2351-9789
VL - 51
SP - 215
EP - 221
JO - Procedia Manufacturing
JF - Procedia Manufacturing
T2 - 30th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, FAIM 2021
Y2 - 15 June 2021 through 18 June 2021
ER -