TY - GEN
T1 - Automatic denoising parameter estimation using gradient histograms
AU - Seybold, Tamara
AU - Kuhn, Florian
AU - Habigt, Julian
AU - Hartenstein, Mark
AU - Stechele, Walter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 IEEE.
PY - 2015/2/27
Y1 - 2015/2/27
N2 - State-of-the-art denoising methods provide denoising results that can be considered close to optimal. The denoising methods usually have one or more parameters regulating denoising strength that can be adapted for a specific image. To obtain the optimal denoising result, the correct parameter setting is crucial. In this paper, we therefore propose a method that can automatically estimate the optimal parameter of a denoising algorithm. Our approach compares the gradient histogram of a denoised image to an estimated reference gradient histogram. The reference gradient histogram is estimated based on down-and upsampling of the noisy image, thus our method works without a reference and is image-adaptive. We evaluate our propsed down-/upsampling-based gradient histogram method (DUG) based on a subjective test with 20 participants. In the test data, we included images from both the Kodak data set and the more realistic ARRI data set and we used the state-of-the-art denoising method BM3D. Based on the test results we can show that the parameter estimated by our method is very close to the human perception. Despite being very fast and simple to implement, our method shows a lower error than all other suitable no-reference metrics we found.
AB - State-of-the-art denoising methods provide denoising results that can be considered close to optimal. The denoising methods usually have one or more parameters regulating denoising strength that can be adapted for a specific image. To obtain the optimal denoising result, the correct parameter setting is crucial. In this paper, we therefore propose a method that can automatically estimate the optimal parameter of a denoising algorithm. Our approach compares the gradient histogram of a denoised image to an estimated reference gradient histogram. The reference gradient histogram is estimated based on down-and upsampling of the noisy image, thus our method works without a reference and is image-adaptive. We evaluate our propsed down-/upsampling-based gradient histogram method (DUG) based on a subjective test with 20 participants. In the test data, we included images from both the Kodak data set and the more realistic ARRI data set and we used the state-of-the-art denoising method BM3D. Based on the test results we can show that the parameter estimated by our method is very close to the human perception. Despite being very fast and simple to implement, our method shows a lower error than all other suitable no-reference metrics we found.
KW - denoising
KW - no-reference metrics
KW - noise reduction
KW - parameter estimation
KW - parameter optimization
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84925433453
U2 - 10.1109/VCIP.2014.7051580
DO - 10.1109/VCIP.2014.7051580
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84925433453
T3 - 2014 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing Conference, VCIP 2014
SP - 358
EP - 361
BT - 2014 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing Conference, VCIP 2014
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2014 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing Conference, VCIP 2014
Y2 - 7 December 2014 through 10 December 2014
ER -