TY - JOUR
T1 - Antipsychotic drugs versus placebo for relapse prevention in schizophrenia
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Leucht, Stefan
AU - Tardy, Magdolna
AU - Komossa, Katja
AU - Heres, Stephan
AU - Kissling, Werner
AU - Salanti, Georgia
AU - Davis, John M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support was mainly provided by a grant from the German Ministry for Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung), number 01KG0816 88166528. GS was supported by a grant from the European Research Council (IMMA 260559). The authors thank the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group for its support for this review; Michael Borenstein for his statistical advice on publication bias; Richard Skodnek for his work on a preliminary version of this review; and Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, Sanofi-Aventis, Eric Chen, George Gardos, Julian Leff, and Erik Denys for additional information. This Article is a copublication with a Cochrane Review (Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 5: CD008016).
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Background Relapse prevention with antipsychotic drugs compared with placebo in patients with schizophrenia has not been suffi ciently addressed by previous systematic reviews. We aimed to assess the association between such drugs and various outcomes in patients with schizophrenia to resolve controversial issues. Methods We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's specialised register for reports published before Nov 11, 2008; and PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov for those before June 8, 2011. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and searched the reference lists of included studies and previous reviews. Randomised trials of patients with schizophrenia continued on or withdrawn from any antipsychotic drug regimen after stabilisation were eligible. Our primary outcome was relapse between 7 and 12 months. We also examined safety and various functional outcomes. We used the random eff ects model and verifi ed results for the primary outcome with a fi xed eff ects model. Heterogeneity was investigated with subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Findings We identifi ed 116 suitable reports from 65 trials, with data for 6493 patients. Antipsychotic drugs signifi cantly reduced relapse rates at 1 year (drugs 27% vs placebo 64%; risk ratio [RR] 0•40, 95% CI 0•33-0•49; number needed to treat to benefi t [NNTB] 3, 95% CI 2-3). Fewer patients given antipsychotic drugs than placebo were readmitted (10% vs 26%; RR 0•38, 95% CI 0•27-0•55; NNTB 5, 4-9), but less than a third of relapsed patients had to be admitted. Limited evidence suggested better quality of life (standardised mean diff erence -0•62, 95% CI -1•15 to -0•09) and fewer aggressive acts (2% vs 12%; RR 0•27, 95% CI 0•15-0•52; NNTB 11, 6-100) with antipsychotic drugs than with placebo. Employment data were scarce and too few deaths were reported to allow signifi cant diff erences to be identifi ed. More patients given antipsychotic drugs than placebo gained weight (10% vs 6%; RR 2•07, 95% CI 2•31-3•25) , had movement disorders (16% vs 9%; 1•55, 1•25-1•93), and experienced sedation (13% vs 9%; 1•50, 1•22-1•84). Substantial heterogeneity in size of eff ect was recorded. In subgroup analyses, number of episodes, whether patients were in remission, abrupt or gradual withdrawal of treatment, length of stability before trial entry, fi rst-generation or secondgeneration drugs, and allocation concealment method did not signifi cantly aff ect relapse risk. Depot preparations reduced relapse (RR 0•31, 95% CI 0•21-0•41) more than did oral drugs (0•46, 0•37-0•57; p=0•03); depot haloperidol (RR 0•14, 95% CI 0•04-0•55) and fl uphenazine (0•23, 0•14-0•39) had the greatest eff ects. The eff ects of antipsychotic drugs were greater in two unblinded trials (0•26, 0•17-0•39) than in most blinded studies (0•42, 0•35-0•51; p= 0•03). In a meta-regression, the diff erence between drug and placebo decreased with study length. Interpretation Maintenance treatment with antipsychotic drugs benefi ts patients with schizophrenia. The advantages of these drugs must be weighed against their side-eff ects. Future studies should focus on outcomes of social participation and clarify the long-term morbidity and mortality of these drugs.
AB - Background Relapse prevention with antipsychotic drugs compared with placebo in patients with schizophrenia has not been suffi ciently addressed by previous systematic reviews. We aimed to assess the association between such drugs and various outcomes in patients with schizophrenia to resolve controversial issues. Methods We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's specialised register for reports published before Nov 11, 2008; and PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov for those before June 8, 2011. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and searched the reference lists of included studies and previous reviews. Randomised trials of patients with schizophrenia continued on or withdrawn from any antipsychotic drug regimen after stabilisation were eligible. Our primary outcome was relapse between 7 and 12 months. We also examined safety and various functional outcomes. We used the random eff ects model and verifi ed results for the primary outcome with a fi xed eff ects model. Heterogeneity was investigated with subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Findings We identifi ed 116 suitable reports from 65 trials, with data for 6493 patients. Antipsychotic drugs signifi cantly reduced relapse rates at 1 year (drugs 27% vs placebo 64%; risk ratio [RR] 0•40, 95% CI 0•33-0•49; number needed to treat to benefi t [NNTB] 3, 95% CI 2-3). Fewer patients given antipsychotic drugs than placebo were readmitted (10% vs 26%; RR 0•38, 95% CI 0•27-0•55; NNTB 5, 4-9), but less than a third of relapsed patients had to be admitted. Limited evidence suggested better quality of life (standardised mean diff erence -0•62, 95% CI -1•15 to -0•09) and fewer aggressive acts (2% vs 12%; RR 0•27, 95% CI 0•15-0•52; NNTB 11, 6-100) with antipsychotic drugs than with placebo. Employment data were scarce and too few deaths were reported to allow signifi cant diff erences to be identifi ed. More patients given antipsychotic drugs than placebo gained weight (10% vs 6%; RR 2•07, 95% CI 2•31-3•25) , had movement disorders (16% vs 9%; 1•55, 1•25-1•93), and experienced sedation (13% vs 9%; 1•50, 1•22-1•84). Substantial heterogeneity in size of eff ect was recorded. In subgroup analyses, number of episodes, whether patients were in remission, abrupt or gradual withdrawal of treatment, length of stability before trial entry, fi rst-generation or secondgeneration drugs, and allocation concealment method did not signifi cantly aff ect relapse risk. Depot preparations reduced relapse (RR 0•31, 95% CI 0•21-0•41) more than did oral drugs (0•46, 0•37-0•57; p=0•03); depot haloperidol (RR 0•14, 95% CI 0•04-0•55) and fl uphenazine (0•23, 0•14-0•39) had the greatest eff ects. The eff ects of antipsychotic drugs were greater in two unblinded trials (0•26, 0•17-0•39) than in most blinded studies (0•42, 0•35-0•51; p= 0•03). In a meta-regression, the diff erence between drug and placebo decreased with study length. Interpretation Maintenance treatment with antipsychotic drugs benefi ts patients with schizophrenia. The advantages of these drugs must be weighed against their side-eff ects. Future studies should focus on outcomes of social participation and clarify the long-term morbidity and mortality of these drugs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861585734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60239-6
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60239-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 22560607
AN - SCOPUS:84861585734
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 379
SP - 2063
EP - 2071
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 9831
ER -