TY - JOUR
T1 - Anterior Latissimus Dorsi Transfer for Irreparable Subscapularis Tears Improves Shoulder Kinematics in a Dynamic Biomechanical Cadaveric Shoulder Model
AU - Berthold, Daniel P.
AU - Rupp, Marco Christopher
AU - Obopilwe, Elifho
AU - Siebenlist, Sebastian
AU - Elhassan, Bassem T.
AU - Mazzocca, Augustus D.
AU - Muench, Lukas N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s).
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Background: In young patients with irreparable subscapularis deficiency (SSC-D) and absence of severe osteoarthritis, anterior latissimus dorsi transfer (aLDT) has been proposed as a treatment option to restore the anteroposterior muscular force couple to regain sufficient shoulder function. However, evidence regarding the biomechanical effect of an aLDT on glenohumeral kinematics remains sparse. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an aLDT on range of glenohumeral abduction motion, superior migration of the humeral head (SM), and cumulative deltoid force (cDF) in a simulated SSC-D model using a dynamic shoulder model. It was hypothesized that an aLDT would restore native shoulder kinematics by reestablishing the insufficient anteroposterior force couple. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using a validated shoulder simulator. Glenohumeral abduction angle (gAA), SM, and cDF were compared across 3 conditions: (1) native, (2) SSC-D, and (3) aLDT. gAA and SM were measured using 3-dimensional motion tracking, while cDF was recorded in real time during dynamic abduction motion by load cells connected to actuators. Results: The SSC-D significantly decreased gAA (Δ–9.8°; 95% CI, –14.1° to −5.5°; P <.001) and showed a significant increase in SM (Δ2.0 mm; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.1 mm; P =.003), while cDF was similar (Δ7.8 N; 95% CI, –9.2 to 24.7 N; P =.586) when compared with the native state. Performing an aLDT resulted in a significantly increased gAA (Δ3.8°; 95% CI, 1.8° to 5.7°; P <.001), while cDF (Δ–36.1 N; 95% CI, –48.7 to −23.7 N; P <.001) was significantly reduced compared with the SSC-D. For the aLDT, no anterior subluxation was observed. However, the aLDT was not able to restore native gAA (Δ–6.1°; 95% CI, –8.9° to −3.2°; P <.001). Conclusion: In this cadaveric study, performing an aLDT for an irreparable subscapularis insufficiency restored the anteroposterior force couple and prevented superior and anterior humeral head migration, thus improving glenohumeral kinematics. Furthermore, compensatory deltoid forces were reduced by performing an aLDT. Clinical Relevance: Given the favorable effect of the aLDT on shoulder kinematics in this dynamic shoulder model, performing an aLDT may be considered as a treatment option in patients with irreparable SSC-D.
AB - Background: In young patients with irreparable subscapularis deficiency (SSC-D) and absence of severe osteoarthritis, anterior latissimus dorsi transfer (aLDT) has been proposed as a treatment option to restore the anteroposterior muscular force couple to regain sufficient shoulder function. However, evidence regarding the biomechanical effect of an aLDT on glenohumeral kinematics remains sparse. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an aLDT on range of glenohumeral abduction motion, superior migration of the humeral head (SM), and cumulative deltoid force (cDF) in a simulated SSC-D model using a dynamic shoulder model. It was hypothesized that an aLDT would restore native shoulder kinematics by reestablishing the insufficient anteroposterior force couple. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using a validated shoulder simulator. Glenohumeral abduction angle (gAA), SM, and cDF were compared across 3 conditions: (1) native, (2) SSC-D, and (3) aLDT. gAA and SM were measured using 3-dimensional motion tracking, while cDF was recorded in real time during dynamic abduction motion by load cells connected to actuators. Results: The SSC-D significantly decreased gAA (Δ–9.8°; 95% CI, –14.1° to −5.5°; P <.001) and showed a significant increase in SM (Δ2.0 mm; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.1 mm; P =.003), while cDF was similar (Δ7.8 N; 95% CI, –9.2 to 24.7 N; P =.586) when compared with the native state. Performing an aLDT resulted in a significantly increased gAA (Δ3.8°; 95% CI, 1.8° to 5.7°; P <.001), while cDF (Δ–36.1 N; 95% CI, –48.7 to −23.7 N; P <.001) was significantly reduced compared with the SSC-D. For the aLDT, no anterior subluxation was observed. However, the aLDT was not able to restore native gAA (Δ–6.1°; 95% CI, –8.9° to −3.2°; P <.001). Conclusion: In this cadaveric study, performing an aLDT for an irreparable subscapularis insufficiency restored the anteroposterior force couple and prevented superior and anterior humeral head migration, thus improving glenohumeral kinematics. Furthermore, compensatory deltoid forces were reduced by performing an aLDT. Clinical Relevance: Given the favorable effect of the aLDT on shoulder kinematics in this dynamic shoulder model, performing an aLDT may be considered as a treatment option in patients with irreparable SSC-D.
KW - irreparable subscapularis tear
KW - latissimus dorsi transfer
KW - muscular force couple
KW - shoulder kinematics
KW - subscapularis deficiency
KW - tendon transfer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184161357&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/03635465231223514
DO - 10.1177/03635465231223514
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85184161357
SN - 0363-5465
VL - 52
SP - 624
EP - 630
JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 3
ER -