Antagonistic pleiotropy may help population-level selection in maintaining genetic polymorphism for transmission rate in a model phytopathogenic fungus

A. Tellier, L. M.M.A. Villaréal, T. Giraud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

It has been shown theoretically that the conditions for the maintenance of polymorphism at pleiotropic loci with antagonistic effects on fitness components are rather restrictive. Here, we use a metapopulation model to investigate whether antagonistic pleiotropy could help maintain polymorphism involving common deleterious alleles in the phytopathogenic fungus Microbotryum violaceum. This fungus causes anther smut disease of the Caryophyllaceae. A previous model has shown that the sex-linked deleterious alleles can be maintained under a metapopulation structure, when intra-tetrad selfing (mating between products of the same meiosis) is high, due to founder effects and selection at the population level. Here, we add two types of pleiotropic advantages to the metapopulation model. A competitive advantage for strains carrying the sex-linked deleterious alleles did not facilitate their maintenance because competitive situations were too rare. In contrast, higher spore production did facilitate the maintenance of the deleterious alleles at low intra-tetrad mating rates and with a large advantage for spore production. These results show that antagonistic pleiotropy may promote the persistence of genetic variation, in combination with other selective forces.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-52
Number of pages8
JournalHeredity
Volume98
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Disease transmission
  • Group selection
  • Infectivity
  • Parasites
  • Protected polymorphism
  • Virulence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antagonistic pleiotropy may help population-level selection in maintaining genetic polymorphism for transmission rate in a model phytopathogenic fungus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this