TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of penalty parameters for interior penalty Galerkin methods
AU - Straßer, Sebastian
AU - Herzog, Hans Georg
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2019/10/21
Y1 - 2019/10/21
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse the influence of penalty parameters for an interior penalty Galerkin method, namely, the symmetric interior penalty Galerkin method. Design/methodology/approach: First of all, the solution of a simple model problem is computed and compared to the exact solution, which is a periodic function. Afterwards, a two-dimensional magnetostatic field problem described by the magnetic vector potential A is considered. In particular, penalty parameters depending on the polynomial degree, the properties of the elements and the material are considered. The analysis is performed by varying the polynomial degree and the mesh sizes on a structured and an unstructured mesh. Additionally, the penalty parameter is varied in a specific range. Findings: Choosing the penalty parameter correctly plays an important role as the stability and the convergence of the numerical scheme can be affected. For a structured mesh, a limiting value for the penalty parameter can be calculated beforehand, whereas for an unstructured mesh, the choice of the penalty parameter can be cumbersome. Originality/value: This paper shows that there exist different penalty parameters which can be taken into account to solve the considered problems. One can choose a global penalty parameter to obtain a stable solution, which is a sharp estimation. There has always to be the consideration to guarantee the coercivity of the bilinear form while minimising the number of iterations.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse the influence of penalty parameters for an interior penalty Galerkin method, namely, the symmetric interior penalty Galerkin method. Design/methodology/approach: First of all, the solution of a simple model problem is computed and compared to the exact solution, which is a periodic function. Afterwards, a two-dimensional magnetostatic field problem described by the magnetic vector potential A is considered. In particular, penalty parameters depending on the polynomial degree, the properties of the elements and the material are considered. The analysis is performed by varying the polynomial degree and the mesh sizes on a structured and an unstructured mesh. Additionally, the penalty parameter is varied in a specific range. Findings: Choosing the penalty parameter correctly plays an important role as the stability and the convergence of the numerical scheme can be affected. For a structured mesh, a limiting value for the penalty parameter can be calculated beforehand, whereas for an unstructured mesh, the choice of the penalty parameter can be cumbersome. Originality/value: This paper shows that there exist different penalty parameters which can be taken into account to solve the considered problems. One can choose a global penalty parameter to obtain a stable solution, which is a sharp estimation. There has always to be the consideration to guarantee the coercivity of the bilinear form while minimising the number of iterations.
KW - Boundary value problems
KW - Finite element method
KW - Numerical analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071114566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/COMPEL-12-2018-0514
DO - 10.1108/COMPEL-12-2018-0514
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071114566
SN - 0332-1649
VL - 38
SP - 1401
EP - 1412
JO - COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering
JF - COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering
IS - 5
ER -