Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Analysis of multiple data sets reveals no association between the insulin gene variable number tandem repeat element and polycystic ovary syndrome or related traits

  • Brenda L. Powell
  • , Lema Haddad
  • , Amanda Bennett
  • , Neda Gharani
  • , Ulla Sovio
  • , Christopher J. Groves
  • , Karen Rush
  • , Micaela J. Goh
  • , Gerard S. Conway
  • , Aimo Ruokonen
  • , Hannu Martikainen
  • , Anneli Pouta
  • , Saara Taponen
  • , Anna Liisa Hartikainen
  • , Stephanie Halford
  • , Eleftheria Zeggini
  • , Marjo Riitta Järvelin
  • , Steve Franks
  • , Mark I. McCarthy
  • University of Oxford
  • Churchill Hospital
  • Imperial College London
  • University College London
  • Oulu University Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: Variation at the insulin gene VNTR (variable number tandem repeat) minisatellite has been reported to be associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), but findings have been inconsistent and all studies have featured small sample sizes. Objective: To gain a robust understanding of the role of the INS-VNTR in PCOS susceptibility. Design: Case-control, family-based association and quantitative trait analyses. Setting and Participants: A UK population comprising 255 parent-offspring trios, 185 additional cases, and 1062 control subjects (cases and controls all British/Irish) as well as 1599 women from a northern Finland population-based birth cohort characterized for PCO symptomatology and testosterone levels. VNTR class was inferred from genotyping of the -23HphI variant. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): INS-VNTR genotype frequencies between subject groups, body mass index, and testosterone levels by genotype. Results: Case-control analyses in both UK and Finnish samples failed to confirm previously reported class III allele associations with PCOS (UK, P = 0.43, Finnish, P = 0.31; Kruskal-Wallis χ2). Transmission analysis in trios showed no excess transmission of either allele (P = 0.62), regardless of parent of origin (maternal: P = 0.73; paternal: P = 0.66). No association between genotype and testosterone levels was seen in any sample (UK PCOS subjects, P = 0.95; Finnish symptomatic cases, P = 0.38; Finnish control women, P = 0.58). Conclusions: Despite the strong biological candidacy and supportive data from previous studies, we conclude that variation at the INS-VNTR has no major role in the development of PCOS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2988-2993
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume90
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of multiple data sets reveals no association between the insulin gene variable number tandem repeat element and polycystic ovary syndrome or related traits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this