An evolutionary argument for the extended mind hypothesis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper will present an argument in support of the Extended Mind Hypothesis (EMH). The argument consists of two sub-arguments, an evolutionary and a systematic one. The evolutionary sub-argument advances that there is good empirical and analytic reason to suppose that the mind is designed by natural selection to extend. The systematic states that EMH is more consistent with the current system of science and scientific taxonomy. In force of the connection between these sub-arguments, I will conclude that EMH is epistemically advan-tageous compared to purely internalist accounts of cognition. Furthermore, this essay situates EMH in a broader landscape of philosophical and scientific ideas and theories about the mind.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-61
Number of pages23
JournalOrbis Idearum
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An evolutionary argument for the extended mind hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this