An ecological momentary assessment study assessing repetitive negative thinking as a predictor for psychopathology

Julia Funk, Celina Müller, Tabea Rosenkranz, Benjamin Aas, Cristina Botella, Felix Burkhardt, Johnny R.J. Fontaine, Mads Frost, Azucena Garcia-Palacios, Christiane Hoessle, Veerle E.I. Huyghe, Johanna Löchner, Alexandra Newbold, Reinhard Pekrun, Belinda Platt, Klaus Scherer, Gerd Schulte-Körne, Björn W. Schuller, Varinka Voigt, Maria VossEdward Watkins, Thomas Ehring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Repetitive negative thinking (RNT), an important transdiagnostic process, is commonly assessed using trait questionnaires. While these instruments ask respondents to estimate their general tendency towards RNT, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) allows to assess how much individuals actually engage in RNT in their daily lives. In a sample of N =  1,176 adolescents and young adults, we investigated whether average levels of RNT assessed via EMA predicted psychopathological symptoms. Adjusting for trait RNT measures and baseline scores on outcome measures, we found that average levels of RNT assessed via EMA significantly predicted higher depressive and anxiety symptoms as well as lower mental well-being at baseline, one-, three-, and twelve-month follow-up. Exploratory analyses of the association between temporal dynamics of RNT (e.g., RNT inertia) and psychopathological symptoms yielded inconsistent results. The high predictive power of average scores on the EMA-based RNT measure suggests that EMA is a promising tool for assessing RNT.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0318453
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume20
Issue number3 March
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2025
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An ecological momentary assessment study assessing repetitive negative thinking as a predictor for psychopathology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this