TY - JOUR
T1 - An automated scoring procedure for the micronucleus test by image analysis
AU - Varga, Dominic
AU - Johannes, Tilman
AU - Jainta, Silke
AU - Schuster, Sonja
AU - Schwarz-Boeger, Ulrike
AU - Kiechle, Marion
AU - Garcia, Brenda Patino
AU - Vogel, Walther
N1 - Funding Information:
We are most grateful to all patients and controls for their donations of blood samples and the self-support groups for active collaboration. We would like to thank Guenter Speit for valuable discussions and for critical reading of the manuscript. The excellent technical assistance of Karina Eiwen is highly appreciated. This work was supported in part by the Deutsche Krebshilfe, grant no. 70-2680-VO2. B.P.G. was a fellow of the DAAD and D.V. of GRK 460. T.J. is an employee of Metasystems, makers of the image analysis system used in this study.
PY - 2004/9
Y1 - 2004/9
N2 - The micronucleus assay (MNT) in human lymphocytes is frequently used to assess chromosomal damage as a consequence of environmental mutagen exposure, to assess the effect of mutagens or to search for reduced DNA repair capacity after a mutagenic challenge. We have established an automated scoring procedure for the cytokinesis blocked MNT based on computerized image analysis (Metasystems Metafer 4 version 2.12). To evaluate the results we used the reproducibility of counts, established a dose-response curve for γ-irradiation and used the ability of the system to differentiate between breast cancer patients and controls as a biological reference, a difference which we had observed before by visual counting. Blood cultures were irradiated with γ -rays (2 Gy) at the beginning and treated with cytochalasin B during the last 24 h. The slides were stained with Giemsa for visual counting and with DAPI for automated analysis. Our test sample consisted of 73 persons (27 with breast cancer and 26 female and 20 male controls). A comparison between visual counting (controls, mean MN frequency 313) and automated counting (mean MN frequency 106) in slides from the same culture revealed a large drop for the automated counts. However, the automated counts were as reproducible as the visual counts [coefficient of variation (CV) on the sample ∼20%; CV on repeated counts of the same slides ∼5%] and both counts were highly correlated. Furthermore, the discrimination between cases and controls improved for automated counting of slides from the same cultures [visual odds rato (OR) ≤ 4.0, P = 0.009; automated OR > 16, P < 0.0001], with a strong dependence on the set of parameters used. This improvement was confirmed in a validation sample of an additional 21 controls and 20 cases (OR = 11, P = 0.0018) performed as a prospective or diagnostic test.
AB - The micronucleus assay (MNT) in human lymphocytes is frequently used to assess chromosomal damage as a consequence of environmental mutagen exposure, to assess the effect of mutagens or to search for reduced DNA repair capacity after a mutagenic challenge. We have established an automated scoring procedure for the cytokinesis blocked MNT based on computerized image analysis (Metasystems Metafer 4 version 2.12). To evaluate the results we used the reproducibility of counts, established a dose-response curve for γ-irradiation and used the ability of the system to differentiate between breast cancer patients and controls as a biological reference, a difference which we had observed before by visual counting. Blood cultures were irradiated with γ -rays (2 Gy) at the beginning and treated with cytochalasin B during the last 24 h. The slides were stained with Giemsa for visual counting and with DAPI for automated analysis. Our test sample consisted of 73 persons (27 with breast cancer and 26 female and 20 male controls). A comparison between visual counting (controls, mean MN frequency 313) and automated counting (mean MN frequency 106) in slides from the same culture revealed a large drop for the automated counts. However, the automated counts were as reproducible as the visual counts [coefficient of variation (CV) on the sample ∼20%; CV on repeated counts of the same slides ∼5%] and both counts were highly correlated. Furthermore, the discrimination between cases and controls improved for automated counting of slides from the same cultures [visual odds rato (OR) ≤ 4.0, P = 0.009; automated OR > 16, P < 0.0001], with a strong dependence on the set of parameters used. This improvement was confirmed in a validation sample of an additional 21 controls and 20 cases (OR = 11, P = 0.0018) performed as a prospective or diagnostic test.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=6444219993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/mutage/geh047
DO - 10.1093/mutage/geh047
M3 - Article
C2 - 15388812
AN - SCOPUS:6444219993
SN - 0267-8357
VL - 19
SP - 391
EP - 397
JO - Mutagenesis
JF - Mutagenesis
IS - 5
ER -