TY - JOUR
T1 - Alternative soil fertility management options in Malawi
T2 - An economic analysis
AU - Sauer, Johannes
AU - Tchale, Hardwick
AU - Wobst, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors extend their appreciation to Dr. Todd Benson at IFPRI who provided the on-farm trials data. This research was made possible through funding by the Robert Bosch Foundation to the Policy Analysis for Sustainable Agricultural Development (PASAD) Project at the Center for Development Research, University of Bonn. The authors sincerely acknowledge the funding. However, the opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of PASAD, Center for Development Research or University of Bonn. These organisations do not guarantee the accuracy of the results of this study and will accept no responsibility for any consequences of their use.
PY - 2007/2/12
Y1 - 2007/2/12
N2 - In this paper, we analyse the factors that influence the productivity of maize among smallholder farmers, given that unfavourable output and input market conditions throughout the 1990s have compelled smallholder farmers into unsustainable agricultural intensification. We use farm-household survey data in order to compare the productivity of smallholder maize production under integrated (ISFM) and chemicalbased soil fertility management using a normalised translog yield response model. The results indicate higher maize yield responses for integrated soil fertility management options after controlling for the intensity of fertilizer application, labour intensity, seed rate, land husbandry practices, as well as selected policy factors. The estimated model is highly consistent with theoretical conditions. Thus, we conclude that the use of ISFM improves maize productivity, compared to the use of inorganic fertilizer only. Since most farmers in the maize-based farming systems are crowded out of the agricultural input market and can hardly afford optimal quantities of inorganic fertilizer, enhancement of ISFM is likely to increase their maize productivity. We finally highlight areas of policy support needed to enhance ISFM uptake in smallholder maize-based farming systems.
AB - In this paper, we analyse the factors that influence the productivity of maize among smallholder farmers, given that unfavourable output and input market conditions throughout the 1990s have compelled smallholder farmers into unsustainable agricultural intensification. We use farm-household survey data in order to compare the productivity of smallholder maize production under integrated (ISFM) and chemicalbased soil fertility management using a normalised translog yield response model. The results indicate higher maize yield responses for integrated soil fertility management options after controlling for the intensity of fertilizer application, labour intensity, seed rate, land husbandry practices, as well as selected policy factors. The estimated model is highly consistent with theoretical conditions. Thus, we conclude that the use of ISFM improves maize productivity, compared to the use of inorganic fertilizer only. Since most farmers in the maize-based farming systems are crowded out of the agricultural input market and can hardly afford optimal quantities of inorganic fertilizer, enhancement of ISFM is likely to increase their maize productivity. We finally highlight areas of policy support needed to enhance ISFM uptake in smallholder maize-based farming systems.
KW - Malawi
KW - Smallholder agriculture
KW - Soil fertility management
KW - Yield response model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947246569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1300/J064v29n03_05
DO - 10.1300/J064v29n03_05
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:33947246569
SN - 1044-0046
VL - 29
SP - 29
EP - 53
JO - Journal of Sustainable Agriculture
JF - Journal of Sustainable Agriculture
IS - 3
ER -