Allocating Healthcare Resources: The Role of Personal Responsibility

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

All modern healthcare systems face the problem of rising healthcare costs. Personal responsibility, if used as a reason for making decisions about the healthcare resources patients receive, is often perceived as ‘blaming the victim’ and as contrary to intuitions of justice and compassion in medicine. A ‘pure’ liberal egalitarian system always faces the problem of becoming a ‘bottomless pit’. In order to set limits to healthcare provision and to ration fairly, the principle of solidarity, and with it the notion of personal responsibility, could be used as an allocation criterion. In liberal healthcare systems based to some degree on solidarity, personal responsibility can be legitimately demanded. Personal responsibility requires knowledge, and the health literacy of large parts of the population remains insufficient. Personal responsibility on a theoretical level has been defended and a way to avoid some of the practical problems connected to implementation proposed.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEthics, Law and Society
Subtitle of host publicationVolume IV
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages341-350
Number of pages10
Volume4
ISBN (Electronic)9781351567763
ISBN (Print)9781315094328
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Allocating Healthcare Resources: The Role of Personal Responsibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this