TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancements in bioengineered and autologous skin grafting techniques for skin reconstruction
T2 - a comprehensive review
AU - Dean, Jillian
AU - Hoch, Cosima
AU - Wollenberg, Barbara
AU - Navidzadeh, Justin
AU - Maheta, Bhagvat
AU - Mandava, Anisha
AU - Knoedler, Samuel
AU - Sherwani, Khalil
AU - Baecher, Helena
AU - Schmitz, Alina
AU - Alfertshofer, Michael
AU - Heiland, Max
AU - Kreutzer, Kilian
AU - Koerdt, Steffen
AU - Knoedler, Leonard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Dean, Hoch, Wollenberg, Navidzadeh, Maheta, Mandava, Knoedler, Sherwani, Baecher, Schmitz, Alfertshofer, Heiland, Kreutzer, Koerdt and Knoedler.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The reconstruction of complex skin defects challenges clinical practice, with autologous skin grafts (ASGs) as the traditional choice due to their high graft take rate and patient compatibility. However, ASGs have limitations such as donor site morbidity, limited tissue availability, and the necessity for multiple surgeries in severe cases. Bioengineered skin grafts (BSGs) aim to address these drawbacks through advanced tissue engineering and biomaterial science. This study conducts a systematic review to describe the benefits and shortcomings of BSGs and ASGs across wound healing efficacy, tissue integration, immunogenicity, and functional outcomes focusing on wound re-epithelialization, graft survival, and overall aesthetic outcomes. Preliminary findings suggest ASGs show superior early results, while BSGs demonstrate comparable long-term outcomes with reduced donor site morbidity. This comparative analysis enhances understanding of bioengineered alternatives in skin reconstruction, potentially redefining best practices based on efficacy, safety, and patient-centric outcomes, highlighting the need for further innovation in bioengineered solutions.
AB - The reconstruction of complex skin defects challenges clinical practice, with autologous skin grafts (ASGs) as the traditional choice due to their high graft take rate and patient compatibility. However, ASGs have limitations such as donor site morbidity, limited tissue availability, and the necessity for multiple surgeries in severe cases. Bioengineered skin grafts (BSGs) aim to address these drawbacks through advanced tissue engineering and biomaterial science. This study conducts a systematic review to describe the benefits and shortcomings of BSGs and ASGs across wound healing efficacy, tissue integration, immunogenicity, and functional outcomes focusing on wound re-epithelialization, graft survival, and overall aesthetic outcomes. Preliminary findings suggest ASGs show superior early results, while BSGs demonstrate comparable long-term outcomes with reduced donor site morbidity. This comparative analysis enhances understanding of bioengineered alternatives in skin reconstruction, potentially redefining best practices based on efficacy, safety, and patient-centric outcomes, highlighting the need for further innovation in bioengineered solutions.
KW - autologous skin grafting
KW - bioengineered skin grafts
KW - dermatologic surgery
KW - human skin substitute
KW - plastic surgery
KW - skin deficits
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215518468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1461328
DO - 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1461328
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85215518468
SN - 2296-4185
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
JF - Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
M1 - 1461328
ER -