ADULTS’ STRATEGY USE IN COMPLEX FRACTION COMPARISON

Andreas Obersteiner, Vijay Marupudi, Martha W. Alibali

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Several studies have found that when people compare fractions, they show a “natural number bias”, that is, better performance on problems in which the larger fraction has the larger components (e.g., 7/8 vs. 2/3) than on problems in which the larger fraction has the smaller components (e.g., 2/3 vs. 4/9). However, more recent studies found the opposite pattern (“reverse bias”). To better understand what causes these patterns, we investigated adults’ strategies in complex comparison problems with varying affordances. Adults reported strategies on a trial-by-trial basis. Overall, we found a reverse bias pattern. Strategy use varied by problem type, suggesting that participants used strategies adaptively. The study highlights variability in strategy use depending on problem type, which may account for diverse bias patterns in previous studies.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 43rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2019
EditorsMellony Graven, Hamsa Venkat, Anthony A Essien, Pamela Vale
PublisherPsychology of Mathematics Education (PME)
Pages153-160
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9780639821542
StatePublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes
Event43rd Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME 2019 - Pretoria, South Africa
Duration: 7 Jul 201912 Jul 2019

Publication series

NameProceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
Volume3
ISSN (Print)0771-100X
ISSN (Electronic)2790-3648

Conference

Conference43rd Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME 2019
Country/TerritorySouth Africa
CityPretoria
Period7/07/1912/07/19

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ADULTS’ STRATEGY USE IN COMPLEX FRACTION COMPARISON'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this