TY - JOUR
T1 - Acupuncture and acupressure for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea - A randomised cross-over pilot study
AU - Melchart, Dieter
AU - Ihbe-Heffinger, Angela
AU - Leps, Birgit
AU - Von Schilling, Christoph
AU - Linde, Klaus
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Li Li for performing acupuncture in the trial. The study was realised without external funding from the resources of the Centre for Complementary Medicine Research. Acupressure bands were kindly supplied by Hop GmbH, Haibach, Germany.
PY - 2006/8
Y1 - 2006/8
N2 - Objective: To investigate whether a combination of acupuncture and acupressure is effective for reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Patients and methods: In a randomised cross-over trial, 28 patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy and conventional standard antiemesis were treated for one chemotherapy cycle with a combination of acupuncture and acupressure at point P6 and for one cycle at a close sham point. The main outcome measure was a nausea score derived from daily intensity rating. Results: There was no difference between combined acupuncture and acupressure treatment at P6 and at the sham point for the nausea score, but the level of nausea was very low in both phases. The mean nausea score was 6.2 (standard deviation 9.0) for treatment at P6 and 6.3 (9.1) for treatment at the sham point (mean difference -0.1, 95% confidence interval -3.9 to 3.7; p=0.96). Seventeen of 21 participants completing the study would desire acupuncture and acupressure for future chemotherapy cycles, but there was no clear preference for either point. Conclusion: In this small pilot study a significant difference between treatment at P6 and a close sham point could not be detected. However, it cannot be ruled out that an existing difference was missed due to the small sample size.
AB - Objective: To investigate whether a combination of acupuncture and acupressure is effective for reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Patients and methods: In a randomised cross-over trial, 28 patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy and conventional standard antiemesis were treated for one chemotherapy cycle with a combination of acupuncture and acupressure at point P6 and for one cycle at a close sham point. The main outcome measure was a nausea score derived from daily intensity rating. Results: There was no difference between combined acupuncture and acupressure treatment at P6 and at the sham point for the nausea score, but the level of nausea was very low in both phases. The mean nausea score was 6.2 (standard deviation 9.0) for treatment at P6 and 6.3 (9.1) for treatment at the sham point (mean difference -0.1, 95% confidence interval -3.9 to 3.7; p=0.96). Seventeen of 21 participants completing the study would desire acupuncture and acupressure for future chemotherapy cycles, but there was no clear preference for either point. Conclusion: In this small pilot study a significant difference between treatment at P6 and a close sham point could not be detected. However, it cannot be ruled out that an existing difference was missed due to the small sample size.
KW - Acupuncture
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Emesis
KW - Nausea
KW - Randomised controlled trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745966851&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00520-006-0028-7
DO - 10.1007/s00520-006-0028-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 16523265
AN - SCOPUS:33745966851
SN - 0941-4355
VL - 14
SP - 878
EP - 882
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
IS - 8
ER -