Abstract
Although the prevalence of patients with achalasia developing an esophageal carcinoma is low the risk is nearly 140-fold; there is no difference in prognosis between patients with achalasia-carcinoma and those with esophageal cancer without achalasia. We propose a follow-up with biennial endoscopies after 15-20 years of known achalasia. This is accordance with a recent consensus conference, which accepted the recommendation of the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [3]. In doubtful findings we recommend brush cytologies and/or biopsies, especially if there should be a recurrence of "old symptoms" or the appearance of "new difficulties" which suggest the possibility of a malignant growth.
| Translated title of the contribution | Achalasia and carcinoma of the esophagus: incidence, prevalence and prognosis |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Pages (from-to) | 1357-1359 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie. Supplement. Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. Kongress |
| Volume | 115 |
| State | Published - 1998 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Achalasia and carcinoma of the esophagus: incidence, prevalence and prognosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver