TY - JOUR
T1 - Abduction of trap invariants in parameterized systems
AU - Esparza, Javier
AU - Raskin, Mikhail
AU - Welzel, Christoph
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Open Publishing Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9/17
Y1 - 2021/9/17
N2 - In a previous paper we have presented a CEGAR approach for the verification of parameterized systems with an arbitrary number of processes organized in an array or a ring [19]. The technique is based on the iterative computation of parameterized invariants, i.e., infinite families of invariants for the infinitely many instances of the system. Safety properties are proved by checking that every global configuration of the system satisfying all parameterized invariants also satisfies the property; we have shown that this check can be reduced to the satisfiability problem for Monadic Second Order on words, which is decidable. A strong limitation of the approach is that processes can only have a fixed number of variables with a fixed finite range. In particular, they cannot use variables with range [0, N − 1], where N is the number of processes, which appear in many standard distributed algorithms. In this paper, we extend our technique to this case. While conducting the check whether a safety property is inductive assuming a computed set of invariants becomes undecidable, we show how to reduce it to checking satisfiability of a first-order formula. We report on experiments showing that automatic first-order theorem provers can still perform this check for a collection of non-trivial examples. Additionally, we can give small sets of readable invariants for these checks.
AB - In a previous paper we have presented a CEGAR approach for the verification of parameterized systems with an arbitrary number of processes organized in an array or a ring [19]. The technique is based on the iterative computation of parameterized invariants, i.e., infinite families of invariants for the infinitely many instances of the system. Safety properties are proved by checking that every global configuration of the system satisfying all parameterized invariants also satisfies the property; we have shown that this check can be reduced to the satisfiability problem for Monadic Second Order on words, which is decidable. A strong limitation of the approach is that processes can only have a fixed number of variables with a fixed finite range. In particular, they cannot use variables with range [0, N − 1], where N is the number of processes, which appear in many standard distributed algorithms. In this paper, we extend our technique to this case. While conducting the check whether a safety property is inductive assuming a computed set of invariants becomes undecidable, we show how to reduce it to checking satisfiability of a first-order formula. We report on experiments showing that automatic first-order theorem provers can still perform this check for a collection of non-trivial examples. Additionally, we can give small sets of readable invariants for these checks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115871126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4204/EPTCS.346.1
DO - 10.4204/EPTCS.346.1
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85115871126
SN - 2075-2180
VL - 346
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, EPTCS
JF - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, EPTCS
T2 - 12th International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics, and Formal Verification, G and ALF 2021
Y2 - 20 September 2021 through 22 September 2021
ER -