TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review of threshold values of pollen concentrations for symptoms of allergy
AU - Steckling-Muschack, Nadine
AU - Mertes, Hanna
AU - Mittermeier, Isabella
AU - Schutzmeier, Paul
AU - Becker, Jana
AU - Bergmann, Karl Christian
AU - Böse-O′Reilly, Stephan
AU - Buters, Jeroen
AU - Damialis, Athanasios
AU - Heinrich, Joachim
AU - Kabesch, Michael
AU - Nowak, Dennis
AU - Walser-Reichenbach, Sandra
AU - Weinberger, Alisa
AU - Zamfir, Mihai
AU - Herr, Caroline
AU - Kutzora, Susanne
AU - Heinze, Stefanie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Pollen threshold values used in public warning systems are intended to inform people of the risk of developing allergy symptoms. However, there is no consensus about which pollen concentrations provoke allergy symptoms. The aim of this systematic review was the evaluation of studies investigating the relationship between pollen concentrations (alder, ash, birch, hazel, mugwort and ragweed) and the number of cases in which participants visited a doctor, drug consumption and allergy symptoms. This systematic literature review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019112369). A PubMed search was applied and enriched by consultation with experts and a snowball strategy. The included studies were checked for risk of bias (RoB), and extensive data were extracted and compared. Of 511 studies, 22 were eligible according to the previously established inclusion criteria, and 17 from these showed a low RoB. The strongest evidence was reported for ash (Fraxinus) pollen, where an increase of number of doctor’s visits at an interquartile range (IQR) of 18–28 grains/m3 was detected by three studies. Five studies about birch (Betula) pollen showed a threshold value of 45 grains/m3 for increased drug consumption. The evidence of a threshold value was limited for alder (Alnus), hazel (Corylus), mugwort (Artemisia) and ragweed (Ambrosia) pollen. The inconsistent results concerning all types of pollen, except ash pollen, can be the result of multiple factors, e.g., age, gender, allergen content of pollen and individual sensitivity. These influencing factors should be investigated more closely in future research.
AB - Pollen threshold values used in public warning systems are intended to inform people of the risk of developing allergy symptoms. However, there is no consensus about which pollen concentrations provoke allergy symptoms. The aim of this systematic review was the evaluation of studies investigating the relationship between pollen concentrations (alder, ash, birch, hazel, mugwort and ragweed) and the number of cases in which participants visited a doctor, drug consumption and allergy symptoms. This systematic literature review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019112369). A PubMed search was applied and enriched by consultation with experts and a snowball strategy. The included studies were checked for risk of bias (RoB), and extensive data were extracted and compared. Of 511 studies, 22 were eligible according to the previously established inclusion criteria, and 17 from these showed a low RoB. The strongest evidence was reported for ash (Fraxinus) pollen, where an increase of number of doctor’s visits at an interquartile range (IQR) of 18–28 grains/m3 was detected by three studies. Five studies about birch (Betula) pollen showed a threshold value of 45 grains/m3 for increased drug consumption. The evidence of a threshold value was limited for alder (Alnus), hazel (Corylus), mugwort (Artemisia) and ragweed (Ambrosia) pollen. The inconsistent results concerning all types of pollen, except ash pollen, can be the result of multiple factors, e.g., age, gender, allergen content of pollen and individual sensitivity. These influencing factors should be investigated more closely in future research.
KW - Aeroallergens
KW - Conjunctivitis
KW - Pollen
KW - Pollen thresholds
KW - Rhinitis
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106685967&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10453-021-09709-4
DO - 10.1007/s10453-021-09709-4
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85106685967
SN - 0393-5965
VL - 37
SP - 395
EP - 424
JO - Aerobiologia
JF - Aerobiologia
IS - 3
ER -