A systematic mapping of public health master’s and structured doctoral programs in Germany

Hanna Saturska, Katrina Kufer, Sara Pedron, Gesa Meyer, Karl Emmert-Fees, Michael Laxy, Anna Janina Stephan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Well-trained public health professionals are key to addressing both global and local public health challenges of the twenty-first century. Though availability of programs has increased, the population health science (PHS) and public health (PH) higher education landscape in Germany remains scattered. To date, no comprehensive overview of programs exists. Objectives: This study aimed to map PHS and PH master’s and structured doctoral programs in Germany, including selected program characteristics, curricula and target competencies. Methods: We conducted a systematic mapping of PHS and PH programs in Germany following a prospectively registered protocol (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KTCBA). Relevant master’s and doctoral programs were identified by two study authors independently searching a comprehensive higher education database, which was, for doctoral programs, supplemented with a google search. For PHS programs, general characteristics were mapped and for the subset of PH programs, in-depth characteristics were extracted. Results: Overall, 75 master’s and 18 structured doctoral PHS programs were included. Of these, 23 master’s and 8 doctoral programs focused specifically on PH. The majority of PHS master’s programs awarded a Master of Science degree (55 out of 75 programs). The PH master’s program curricula offered various courses, allowing for different specializations. Courses on topics like public health, epidemiology, health systems (research) and research methods were common for the majority of the master’s programs, while courses on physical activity, behavioral science, nutrition, and mental health were offered less frequently. Structured PH doctoral programs were mainly offered by medical faculties (6 out of 8 programs) and awarded a doctorate of philosophy (Ph.D.) (6 out of 8 programs). PH doctoral programs were very heterogeneous regarding curricula, entry, and publication requirements. There was a broad geographical distribution of programs across Germany, with educational clusters in Munich, Berlin, Bielefeld and Düsseldorf. Conclusion: Germany offers a diverse landscape of PHS and PH master’s programs, but only few structured doctoral programs. The variety of mandatory courses and competencies in these programs reflect Germany’s higher education system’s answer to the evolving demands of the PH sector. This review may aid in advancing PH education both in Germany and globally.

Original languageEnglish
Article number872
JournalBMC Medical Education
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Challenges of public health education
  • Curricula
  • Doctoral program
  • Education
  • Germany
  • Health professionals
  • MPH programs
  • Master’s program
  • Public health
  • Systematic mapping

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic mapping of public health master’s and structured doctoral programs in Germany'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this