Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A regional nuclear conflict would compromise global food security

  • Jonas Jagermeyr
  • , Alan Robock
  • , Joshua Elliott
  • , Christoph Muller
  • , Lili Xia
  • , Nikolay Khabarov
  • , Christian Folberth
  • , Erwin Schmid
  • , Wenfeng Liu
  • , Florian Zabel
  • , Sam S. Rabin
  • , Michael J. Puma
  • , Alison Heslin
  • , James Franke
  • , Ian Foster
  • , Senthold Asseng
  • , Charles G. Bardeen
  • , Owen B. Toon
  • , Cynthia Rosenzweig
  • Department of Computer Science, The University of Chicago
  • NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
  • Member of the Leibniz Association
  • Rutgers University–New Brunswick
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg
  • University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences
  • University Paris-Sud
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
  • University of Munich
  • Humanoid Technologies Lab (H2T)
  • Center for Climate Systems Research
  • University of Chicago
  • Argonne National Laboratory
  • University of Florida
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • University of Colorado Boulder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

85 Scopus citations

Abstract

A limited nuclear war between India and Pakistan could ignite fires large enough to emit more than 5 Tg of soot into the stratosphere. Climate model simulations have shown severe resulting climate perturbations with declines in global mean temperature by 1.8 °C and precipitation by 8%, for at least 5 y. Here we evaluate impacts for the global food system. Six harmonized state-of-the-art crop models show that global caloric production from maize, wheat, rice, and soybean falls by 13 (±1)%, 11 (±8)%, 3 (±5)%, and 17 (±2)% over 5 y. Total single-year losses of 12 (±4)% quadruple the largest observed historical anomaly and exceed impacts caused by historic droughts and volcanic eruptions. Colder temperatures drive losses more than changes in precipitation and solar radiation, leading to strongest impacts in temperate regions poleward of 30°N, including the United States, Europe, and China for 10 to 15 y. Integrated food trade network analyses show that domestic reserves and global trade can largely buffer the production anomaly in the first year. Persistent multiyear losses, however, would constrain domestic food availability and propagate to the Global South, especially to food-insecure countries. By year 5, maize and wheat availability would decrease by 13% globally and by more than 20% in 71 countries with a cumulative population of 1.3 billion people. In view of increasing instability in South Asia, this study shows that a regional conflict using <1% of the worldwide nuclear arsenal could have adverse consequences for global food security unmatched in modern history.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7071-7081
Number of pages11
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume117
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - 31 Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Cold temperature yield response
  • Food system shock
  • Global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI)
  • India-Pakistan conflict
  • Multiple breadbasket failure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A regional nuclear conflict would compromise global food security'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this