TY - GEN
T1 - A rapid manufacturing process for extrusion-based 3D printers
AU - Schroeffer, Andreas
AU - Trescher, Matthias
AU - Struebig, Konstantin
AU - Krieger, Yannick
AU - Lueth, Tim C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 ASME.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The generation of plastic parts in small volume batches has an enormous economic significance. Application fields for parts in small lot sizes are the fabrication of prototypes in the design process or individualized products. The goal thereby often is not only to produce show objects, but functional parts with specific materials, high dimensional accuracy and proper mechanical properties in a short amount of time. The conventional way to produce thermoplastic plastic parts is given by injection molding and extrusion. Characteristics for this technology are the resulting good and homogeneous mechanical component properties, but shape freedom is limited and the process is time consumptive because an individual tool is needed for each product. Depending on the design of the part the geometry of the tool can be complex and an iterative process is necessary to create a suitable mold. On the other hand, the technology of additive manufacturing is a growing market for the quick and cheap production of parts as prototypes, but still the range of materials is limited and anisotropic mechanical component properties are ongoing problems. The combination of both technologies is known as rapid tooling, where the mold is produced in an additive manufacturing process and then used in an injection molding or casting process. This approach combines the benefits of both technologies in term of time and cost efficiency and good component properties. Problems here are the combination of different materials for mold and component and the missing process knowledge and automatization. In this paper an extrusion-based additive manufacturing technology is used to combine additive manufacturing and injection infill generation for thermoplast in one process. The proposed working principle is to generate the outer contour of the part by filament extrusion as mold to ensure high accuracy and good surface quality and fill the mold using an extrusion process of polymer melt without filament generation. Accordingly, the mold becomes part of the component and the same material can be used for the mold and the infill. Since the viscosity of most thermoplastic polymer melts is too high to fill big structures and undercuts, an algorithm is proposed to generate a chamber structure inside the part. Consequently, the fabrication process consists of several iterative cycles of mold generation and injection processes. For this paper polyamide 6 is used to demonstrate the process. Experiments were performed to find the optimal chamber geometry and size to avoid holes and generate a high quality infill. Several component properties such as density, tensile strength and fabrication time are analyzed. In spite of still existing blowholes, a higher component density could be achieved with the proposed process compared to additive manufacturing. However, the tensile strength is still significantly lower. The failures appeared at the weld lines, where warm polymer melt was injected to already colder chambers below. Still manual processes are sources of possible defects as well. The integration of a RFID chip is shown as an additional feature of the process of easy integration of passive electronic elements.
AB - The generation of plastic parts in small volume batches has an enormous economic significance. Application fields for parts in small lot sizes are the fabrication of prototypes in the design process or individualized products. The goal thereby often is not only to produce show objects, but functional parts with specific materials, high dimensional accuracy and proper mechanical properties in a short amount of time. The conventional way to produce thermoplastic plastic parts is given by injection molding and extrusion. Characteristics for this technology are the resulting good and homogeneous mechanical component properties, but shape freedom is limited and the process is time consumptive because an individual tool is needed for each product. Depending on the design of the part the geometry of the tool can be complex and an iterative process is necessary to create a suitable mold. On the other hand, the technology of additive manufacturing is a growing market for the quick and cheap production of parts as prototypes, but still the range of materials is limited and anisotropic mechanical component properties are ongoing problems. The combination of both technologies is known as rapid tooling, where the mold is produced in an additive manufacturing process and then used in an injection molding or casting process. This approach combines the benefits of both technologies in term of time and cost efficiency and good component properties. Problems here are the combination of different materials for mold and component and the missing process knowledge and automatization. In this paper an extrusion-based additive manufacturing technology is used to combine additive manufacturing and injection infill generation for thermoplast in one process. The proposed working principle is to generate the outer contour of the part by filament extrusion as mold to ensure high accuracy and good surface quality and fill the mold using an extrusion process of polymer melt without filament generation. Accordingly, the mold becomes part of the component and the same material can be used for the mold and the infill. Since the viscosity of most thermoplastic polymer melts is too high to fill big structures and undercuts, an algorithm is proposed to generate a chamber structure inside the part. Consequently, the fabrication process consists of several iterative cycles of mold generation and injection processes. For this paper polyamide 6 is used to demonstrate the process. Experiments were performed to find the optimal chamber geometry and size to avoid holes and generate a high quality infill. Several component properties such as density, tensile strength and fabrication time are analyzed. In spite of still existing blowholes, a higher component density could be achieved with the proposed process compared to additive manufacturing. However, the tensile strength is still significantly lower. The failures appeared at the weld lines, where warm polymer melt was injected to already colder chambers below. Still manual processes are sources of possible defects as well. The integration of a RFID chip is shown as an additional feature of the process of easy integration of passive electronic elements.
KW - Additive manufacturing
KW - Building strategies
KW - Polymer processing
KW - Rapid manufacturing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078752336&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/IMECE2019-10022
DO - 10.1115/IMECE2019-10022
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85078752336
T3 - ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE)
BT - Advanced Manufacturing
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME 2019 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE 2019
Y2 - 11 November 2019 through 14 November 2019
ER -