TY - JOUR
T1 - A Randomized Controlled Trial
T2 - Regenerative Effects, Efficacy and Safety of Erythropoietin in Burn and Scalding Injuries
AU - “EPO in Burns” Study Group
AU - Günter, Christina I.
AU - Machens, Hans Günther
AU - Ilg, Felicitas P.
AU - Hapfelmeier, Alexander
AU - Jelkmann, Wolfgang
AU - Egert-Schwender, Silvia
AU - Giri, Shibashish
AU - Bader, Augustinus
AU - Dunda, S.
AU - Grieb, G.
AU - Wolter, T.
AU - Pallua, N.
AU - Namdar, T.
AU - Ottomann, C.
AU - von Wild, T.
AU - Mailänder, P.
AU - Thamm, O. C.
AU - Dornseifer, U.
AU - Lonic, D.
AU - Ninkovic, M.
AU - Siemers, F.
AU - Sievers, R.
AU - Reichert, B.
AU - Ernert, C.
AU - Steen, M.
AU - Schaller, H. E.
AU - Otte, M.
AU - Hartmann, B.
AU - Ryu, S. M.
AU - Pierson, T.
AU - Ohmann, C.
AU - Neugebauer, E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2018 Günter, Machens, Ilg, Hapfelmeier, Jelkmann, Egert-Schwender, Giri, “EPO in Burns” Study Group and Bader.
PY - 2018/10/31
Y1 - 2018/10/31
N2 - In adult’s burn injuries belong to the top 15 causes of injury. Annually more than a million patients receive specialized treatment. Improving burned patients’ outcomes is still a challenge. Effects of erythropoietin (EPO) are reported to be pro-angiogenic, pro-regenerative, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and hypoxia/ischemia protective. Study objectives were to demonstrate cytoprotective and regenerative effects of EPO in burned patients in terms of improved wound healing, reduced morbidity and mortality. This was a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial. The trial was conducted in 13 specialized burn care centers in Germany. Adult Patients with 2b° or 3° burn injuries were included. Patients received state of the art burn care including obligatory split skin graft transplantation. Study medication was EPO or placebo every other day for 21 days. Between 12/08 and 06/14, 116 patients were randomized, 84 received study medication (EPO 45, Placebo 39). Primary endpoint analysis revealed inconclusive results, as only a minority of patients reached the primary endpoint [100% re-epithelialization: EPO: 23% (9/40); Placebo 30% (11/37)]. Several secondary endpoints such as SOFA score (morbidity), EPO level in blood and wound healing onset revealed clinical, and statistically significant results in favor of the EPO group. Adverse Events (AEs) and Severe Adverse Events (SAEs) were in expected ranges; AEs EPO: 80%, (36/45), Placebo: 77%, (30/39); SAEs EPO: 24%, (11/45), Placebo: 24%, (8/39). Out of 84 patients two died, one per group, thus mortality was lower than expected. Results (SOFA score) indicate a lower morbidity of the EPO group, suggesting pro-regenerative effects of EPO in burned patients. Higher EPO levels might influence the faster onset of re-epithelialization in the first 10 days of the treatment. Both effects could reveal new therapeutic options. Clinical Trial Registration: ISRCT Number: ISRCTN95777824 and EudraCT Number: 2006-002886-38, Protocol Number: 0506.
AB - In adult’s burn injuries belong to the top 15 causes of injury. Annually more than a million patients receive specialized treatment. Improving burned patients’ outcomes is still a challenge. Effects of erythropoietin (EPO) are reported to be pro-angiogenic, pro-regenerative, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and hypoxia/ischemia protective. Study objectives were to demonstrate cytoprotective and regenerative effects of EPO in burned patients in terms of improved wound healing, reduced morbidity and mortality. This was a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial. The trial was conducted in 13 specialized burn care centers in Germany. Adult Patients with 2b° or 3° burn injuries were included. Patients received state of the art burn care including obligatory split skin graft transplantation. Study medication was EPO or placebo every other day for 21 days. Between 12/08 and 06/14, 116 patients were randomized, 84 received study medication (EPO 45, Placebo 39). Primary endpoint analysis revealed inconclusive results, as only a minority of patients reached the primary endpoint [100% re-epithelialization: EPO: 23% (9/40); Placebo 30% (11/37)]. Several secondary endpoints such as SOFA score (morbidity), EPO level in blood and wound healing onset revealed clinical, and statistically significant results in favor of the EPO group. Adverse Events (AEs) and Severe Adverse Events (SAEs) were in expected ranges; AEs EPO: 80%, (36/45), Placebo: 77%, (30/39); SAEs EPO: 24%, (11/45), Placebo: 24%, (8/39). Out of 84 patients two died, one per group, thus mortality was lower than expected. Results (SOFA score) indicate a lower morbidity of the EPO group, suggesting pro-regenerative effects of EPO in burned patients. Higher EPO levels might influence the faster onset of re-epithelialization in the first 10 days of the treatment. Both effects could reveal new therapeutic options. Clinical Trial Registration: ISRCT Number: ISRCTN95777824 and EudraCT Number: 2006-002886-38, Protocol Number: 0506.
KW - burn injuries
KW - erythropoietin (EPO)
KW - randomized clinical trial
KW - regenerative medicine
KW - wound healing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084702011&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fphar.2018.00951
DO - 10.3389/fphar.2018.00951
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084702011
SN - 1663-9812
VL - 9
JO - Frontiers in Pharmacology
JF - Frontiers in Pharmacology
M1 - 951
ER -