Abstract
In the context of extreme event ecology, identification of pointer years has become a central aspect of tree-ring research. However, the variety of methods employed for pointer year detection since the introduction of the concept in 1979 impedes a direct comparison among studies. Moreover, most commonly used methods partly rely on arbitrarily selected thresholds, resulting in a potentially inconsistent application of those means. To overcome these discrepancies, we here introduce the “standardized growth change” method SGC, which relies on probability density functions of standardized year-to-year ring width differences and internationally accepted significance levels. To evaluate the performance of SGC, it is applied to 1000 pseudo-populations with known properties as well as to an existing Scots pine tree ring data set and compare the results derived from SGC to the four most frequently applied pointer year detection methods. Our comparative evaluation indicates SGC to supersede the other considered methods. In particular, it identified all artificially introduced pointer years in the pseudo-populations, whereas the other methods missed between 3 and 96 percent of known events. A detailed evaluation of misclassifications by the other approaches points out method-specific weaknesses. Finally, we provide technical aspects and recommendations for the application of SGC in a broader context.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 125746 |
Journal | Dendrochronologia |
Volume | 63 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2020 |
Keywords
- Extreme events
- Interval trend
- Normalization in a moving window
- Relative growth change
- Standardization