Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A multilaboratory comparison of calibration accuracy and the performance of external references in analytical ultracentrifugation

  • Huaying Zhao
  • , Rodolfo Ghirlando
  • , Carlos Alfonso
  • , Fumio Arisaka
  • , Ilan Attali
  • , David L. Bain
  • , Marina M. Bakhtina
  • , Donald F. Becker
  • , Gregory J. Bedwell
  • , Ahmet Bekdemir
  • , Tabot M.D. Besong
  • , Catherine Birck
  • , Chad A. Brautigam
  • , William Brennerman
  • , Olwyn Byron
  • , Agnieszka Bzowska
  • , Jonathan B. Chaires
  • , Catherine T. Chaton
  • , Helmut Cölfen
  • , Keith D. Connaghan
  • Kimberly A. Crowley, Ute Curth, Tina Daviter, William L. Dean, Ana I. Díez, Christine Ebel, Debra M. Eckert, Leslie E. Eisele, Edward Eisenstein, Patrick England, Carlos Escalante, Jeffrey A. Fagan, Robert Fairman, Ron M. Finn, Wolfgang Fischle, José García De La Torre, Jayesh Gor, Henning Gustafsson, Damien Hall, Stephen E. Harding, José G. Hernández Cifre, Andrew B. Herr, Elizabeth E. Howell, Richard S. Isaac, Shu Chuan Jao, Davis Jose, Soon Jong Kim, Bashkim Kokona, Jack A. Kornblatt, Dalibor Kosek, Elena Krayukhina, Daniel Krzizike, Eric A. Kusznir, Hyewon Kwon, Adam Larson, Thomas M. Laue, Aline Le Roy, Andrew P. Leech, Hauke Lilie, Karolin Luger, Juan R. Luque-Ortega, Jia Ma, Carrie A. May, Ernest L. Maynard, Anna Modrak-Wojcik, Yee Foong Mok, Norbert Mücke, Luitgard Nagel-Steger, Geeta J. Narlikar, Masanori Noda, Amanda Nourse, Tomas Obsil, Chad K. Park, Jin Ku Park, Peter D. Pawelek, Erby E. Perdue, Stephen J. Perkins, Matthew A. Perugini, Craig L. Peterson, Martin G. Peverelli, Grzegorz Piszczek, Gali Prag, Peter E. Prevelige, Bertrand D.E. Raynal, Lenka Rezabkova, Klaus Richter, Alison E. Ringel, Rose Rosenberg, Arthur J. Rowe, Arne C. Rufer, David J. Scott, Javier G. Seravalli, Alexandra S. Solovyova, Renjie Song, David Staunton, Caitlin Stoddard, Katherine Stott, Holger M. Strauss, Werner W. Streicher, John P. Sumida, Sarah G. Swygert, Roman H. Szczepanowski, Ingrid Tessmer, Ronald T. Toth, Ashutosh Tripathy, Susumu Uchiyama, Stephan F.W. Uebel, Satoru Unzai, Anna Vitlin Gruber, Peter H. Von Hippel, Christine Wandrey, Szu Huan Wang, Steven E. Weitzel, Beata Wielgus-Kutrowska, Cynthia Wolberger, Martin Wolff, Edward Wright, Yu Sung Wu, Jacinta M. Wubben, Peter Schuck
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology
  • Nihon University
  • Tel Aviv University
  • University of Colorado Denver
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Nebraska Lincoln
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)
  • University of Nottingham
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
  • Institute for Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology (IGBMC)
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center
  • Beckman Coulter Life Sciences
  • University of Glasgow
  • University of Warsaw
  • University of Louisville
  • University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
  • Universitat Konstanz
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
  • University of London
  • University of Murcia
  • Institut de Biologie Structurale
  • CEA Grenoble
  • University of Utah School of Medicine
  • Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research
  • Ctr. for Adv. Res. in Biotechnology
  • Institut Pasteur, Paris
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • Haverford College
  • Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
  • University College London
  • Novo Nordisk A/S
  • Australian Natl Univ
  • Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
  • University of Tennessee
  • University of California San Francisco
  • Academia Sinica, Institute of Biological Chemistry
  • Academica Sinica
  • University of Oregon
  • Mokpo National University
  • Concordia University
  • Charles University in Prague
  • Osaka University
  • U-Medico Inc.
  • Colorado State University
  • Roche Pharma Research & Early Development
  • University of Washington
  • University of New Hampshire Durham
  • University of York
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
  • Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute
  • German Cancer Research Center
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ)
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
  • Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
  • La Trobe University
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  • Paul Scherrer Institut
  • Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
  • Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
  • University of Newcastle upon Tyne
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Cambridge
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research
  • Novozymes A/S
  • Intl. Inst. Molec. Cell Biol. Warsaw
  • Universität Würzburg
  • University of Kansas
  • University of North Carolina
  • Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry
  • Yokohama City University
  • University of Delaware

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

88 Scopus citations

Abstract

Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a first principles based method to determine absolute sedimentation coefficients and buoyant molar masses of macromolecules and their complexes, reporting on their size and shape in free solution. The purpose of this multi-laboratory study was to establish the precision and accuracy of basic data dimensions in AUC and validate previously proposed calibration techniques. Three kits of AUC cell assemblies containing radial and temperature calibration tools and a bovine serum albumin (BSA) reference sample were shared among 67 laboratories, generating 129 comprehensive data sets. These allowed for an assessment of many parameters of instrument performance, including accuracy of the reported scan time after the start of centrifugation, the accuracy of the temperature calibration, and the accuracy of the radial magnification. The range of sedimentation coefficients obtained for BSA monomer in different instruments and using different optical systems was from 3.655 S to 4.949 S, with a mean and standard deviation of (4.304 ± 0.188) S (4.4%). After the combined application of correction factors derived from the external calibration references for elapsed time, scan velocity, temperature, and radial magnification, the range of s-values was reduced 7-fold with a mean of 4.325 S and a 6-fold reduced standard deviation of ± 0.030 S (0.7%). In addition, the large data set provided an opportunity to determine the instrument-to-instrument variation of the absolute radial positions reported in the scan files, the precision of photometric or refractometric signal magnitudes, and the precision of the calculated apparent molar mass of BSA monomer and the fraction of BSA dimers. These results highlight the necessity and effectiveness of independent calibration of basic AUC data dimensions for reliable quantitative studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0126420
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 21 May 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A multilaboratory comparison of calibration accuracy and the performance of external references in analytical ultracentrifugation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this