Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A methodological framework for deriving the German food-based dietary guidelines 2024: Food groups, nutrient goals, and objective functions

  • Anne Carolin Schäfer
  • , Heiner Boeing
  • , Rozenn Gazan
  • , Johanna Conrad
  • , Kurt Gedrich
  • , Christina Breidenassel
  • , Hans Hauner
  • , Anja Kroke
  • , Jakob Linseisen
  • , Stefan Lorkowski
  • , Ute Nöthlings
  • , Margrit Richter
  • , Lukas Schwingshackl
  • , Florent Vieux
  • , Bernhard Watzl
  • German Nutrition Society
  • Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
  • German Institute of Human Nutrition
  • Technical University of Munich
  • University of Applied Sciences
  • University Hospital Augsburg
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • Halle-Jena-Leipzig
  • Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
  • Federal Research Centre for Nutrition and Food

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

BackgroundFor a growing number of food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs), diet optimization is the tool of choice to account for the complex demands of healthy and sustainable diets. However, decisions about such optimization models’ parameters are rarely reported nor systematically studied.ObjectivesMethodsThe objectives were to develop a framework for (i) the formulation of decision variables based on a hierarchical food classification system; (ii) the mathematical form of the objective function; and (iii) approaches to incorporate nutrient goals.To answer objective (i), food groups from FoodEx2 levels 3-7 were applied as decision variables in a model using acceptability constraints (5th and 95th percentile for food intakes of German adults (n=10,419)) and minimizing the deviation from the average observed dietary intakes. Building upon, to answer objectives (ii) and (iii), twelve models were run using decision variables from FoodEx2 level 3 (n=255), applying either a linear or squared and a relative or absolute way to deviate from observed dietary intakes, and three different lists of nutrient goals (allNUT-DRV, incorporating all nutrient goals; modNUT-DRV excluding nutrients with limited data quality; modNUT-AR using average requirements where applicable instead of recommended intakes).ResultsFoodEx2 food groups proved suitable as diet optimization decision variables. Regarding deviation, the largest differences were between the four different objective function types, e.g., in the linear-relative modNUT-DRV model, 46 food groups of the observed diet were changed to reach the model’s goal, in linear-absolute 78 food groups, squared-relative 167, and squared-absolute 248. The nutrient goals were fulfilled in all models, but the number of binding nutrient constraints was highest in the linear-relative models (e.g. allNUT-DRV: 11 vs. 7 in linear-absolute).ConclusionConsidering the various possibilities to operationalize dietary aspects in an optimization model, this study offers valuable contributions to a framework for developing FBDGs via diet optimization.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0313347
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume20
Issue number3 March
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A methodological framework for deriving the German food-based dietary guidelines 2024: Food groups, nutrient goals, and objective functions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this