Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comprehensive scoping review of methodological approaches and clinical applications of tear fluid biomarkers

  • the Tear Research Network Scoping Review taskforce
  • Maastricht University Medical Center
  • University of Maastricht
  • Jules Stein Eye Institute
  • University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research
  • University of Coimbra
  • University of Coimbra
  • Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC)
  • Aibili-Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research On Light
  • Aston University
  • Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
  • University of New South Wales
  • New England College of Optometry
  • Harvard Medical School
  • Medical College of Georgia
  • Georgia Regents University
  • INSERM U70
  • Univ-Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris-Cité
  • Centre de Recherche Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle
  • Optometrisch Centrum Oud Geleen
  • Oslo University Hospital
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital
  • National Healthcare Group Eye Institute
  • Center of Excellence in Ocular Inflammation
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Singapore Eye Research Institute
  • Duke-NUS Medical School
  • Universidad del Rosario
  • Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga
  • Glasgow Caledonian University
  • Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante
  • National Institute of Health Carlos III
  • Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL)
  • Universidad de Valladolid
  • Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN)
  • Care Vision Freiburg
  • University of Health Sciences
  • Malteser Krankenhaus St. Franziskus-Hospital
  • Sørlandet Hospital Arendal
  • Department of Civil Engineering, University of Memphis
  • School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences
  • Medical University of Bialystok
  • Max-Planck-lnstitut für Kohlenforschung

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Tear fluid is an emerging source of disease biomarkers, drawing attention due to its quick, inexpensive, and non-invasive collection. The advancements in detection techniques enable the measurement of ultra-low biomarker levels from small sample volumes typical of tear fluid. The lack of standardized protocols for collection, processing, and analysis of tear fluid remains a significant challenge. To address this, we convened the Tear Research Network Review Taskforce in 2022 to review protocols from the past three decades, providing a comprehensive overview of the methodologies used in tear fluid biomarker research. A total of 1484 articles published from January 1974 to May 2024 from two electronic databases, Embase and Ovid MEDLINE, were reviewed. An exponential increase in the number of articles on tear fluid biomarkers was observed from 2015 onwards. The two most commonly reported collection methods were; glass capillaries (45.2%), and Schirmer's strips (25%), with glass capillary tube collection remaining the most frequent method until 2019, when Schirmer's strips became the leading method. Most articles analyzed tear fluid proteins (65%) and focused on a single analyte (32.3%). In recent years, an increase was observed in the type and number of examined analytes. The differences in the reported methodologies and protocols underscore the need for standardization and harmonization within the field of tear fluid biomarkers to minimize methodological differences and reduce variability in clinical outcomes. Consistent and detailed reporting is essential for improving the reproducibility and validity of tear fluid studies, in order to advance their potential clinical applications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101338
JournalProgress in Retinal and Eye Research
Volume106
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

Keywords

  • Biomarkers
  • Glass capillaries
  • Schirmer's strip
  • Tear fluid
  • Tear fluid analysis
  • Tear fluid applications
  • Tear fluid collection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comprehensive scoping review of methodological approaches and clinical applications of tear fluid biomarkers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this