TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comparison of Plant Temperatures as Measured by Thermal Imaging and Infrared Thermometry
AU - Hackl, H.
AU - Baresel, J. P.
AU - Mistele, B.
AU - Hu, Y.
AU - Schmidhalter, U.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - The temperature of leaves and canopies of plants has long been recognised to be an indicator of plant water stress and can be assessed by thermometry or thermography. Considerable research has been carried out with each of these techniques individually; however, a comparable assessment has not been done to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, we compared the potential of high-resolution thermography and infrared (IR) thermometry to discriminate among stress treatments (control, drought, salt and combined salt and drought) and cultivar effects in large container-based experiments that mimicked field conditions. Differences among treatments and between cultivars, with differences varying between 1-9 and 0-2°C, respectively, were in dense crop stands comparably well ascertained by IR thermometry and thermography. Both methods allowed discriminating differences in salt tolerance. Interestingly, enough similar results were observed for processed, by unmixing the soil influence, and unprocessed thermal images at soil coverage higher than 60%. Using thermography and IR thermometry, highly significant and close relationships were established between canopy temperature and leaf water potential. Overall, in this study, the more simplistic technique based on IR thermometry performed in dense crop stands similarly well as the more sophisticated method provided by thermography.
AB - The temperature of leaves and canopies of plants has long been recognised to be an indicator of plant water stress and can be assessed by thermometry or thermography. Considerable research has been carried out with each of these techniques individually; however, a comparable assessment has not been done to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, we compared the potential of high-resolution thermography and infrared (IR) thermometry to discriminate among stress treatments (control, drought, salt and combined salt and drought) and cultivar effects in large container-based experiments that mimicked field conditions. Differences among treatments and between cultivars, with differences varying between 1-9 and 0-2°C, respectively, were in dense crop stands comparably well ascertained by IR thermometry and thermography. Both methods allowed discriminating differences in salt tolerance. Interestingly, enough similar results were observed for processed, by unmixing the soil influence, and unprocessed thermal images at soil coverage higher than 60%. Using thermography and IR thermometry, highly significant and close relationships were established between canopy temperature and leaf water potential. Overall, in this study, the more simplistic technique based on IR thermometry performed in dense crop stands similarly well as the more sophisticated method provided by thermography.
KW - Drought
KW - Phenotyping
KW - Salinity
KW - Thermography
KW - Thermometry
KW - Wheat
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868562119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2012.00512.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2012.00512.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84868562119
SN - 0931-2250
VL - 198
SP - 415
EP - 429
JO - Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
JF - Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
IS - 6
ER -