TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparative study of parameter identification methods for equivalent circuit models for lithium-ion batteries and their application to state of health estimation
AU - Sun, Jinghua
AU - Liu, Yixin
AU - Kainz, Josef
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/4/1
Y1 - 2025/4/1
N2 - Accurate estimation of the battery state is a crucial requirement for advanced battery management systems (BMS). Model-based state estimation methods represent the most promising option to meet BMS requirements, where the equivalent circuit model (ECM) is an effective balance between modelling complexity and accuracy. ECM's accuracy is influenced by the combination of chosen model type and parameter identification method. In this paper, batteries are aged under various conditions. Both frequency and time domain measurements are performed on batteries in a variety of aging states. These measurements are employed for comparing all combinations of 7 existing models with 7 common identification methods. In addition, the accuracy of SOH models based on ECM parameters is investigated. The experimental results indicate that for frequency and time domain measurements, the same identification algorithm may exhibit distinct performances. Overall, PSO, GWO and LSQ are ideal candidates. Among them, PSO and GWO perform optimally in the frequency domain environment, while LSQ is superior in the time domain environment. Furthermore, this conclusion does not change with battery aging. Meanwhile, a simpler model structure is even beneficial for efficiently monitoring SOH when utilizing the aforementioned superior identification methods.
AB - Accurate estimation of the battery state is a crucial requirement for advanced battery management systems (BMS). Model-based state estimation methods represent the most promising option to meet BMS requirements, where the equivalent circuit model (ECM) is an effective balance between modelling complexity and accuracy. ECM's accuracy is influenced by the combination of chosen model type and parameter identification method. In this paper, batteries are aged under various conditions. Both frequency and time domain measurements are performed on batteries in a variety of aging states. These measurements are employed for comparing all combinations of 7 existing models with 7 common identification methods. In addition, the accuracy of SOH models based on ECM parameters is investigated. The experimental results indicate that for frequency and time domain measurements, the same identification algorithm may exhibit distinct performances. Overall, PSO, GWO and LSQ are ideal candidates. Among them, PSO and GWO perform optimally in the frequency domain environment, while LSQ is superior in the time domain environment. Furthermore, this conclusion does not change with battery aging. Meanwhile, a simpler model structure is even beneficial for efficiently monitoring SOH when utilizing the aforementioned superior identification methods.
KW - Comparative study
KW - Equivalent circuit model
KW - Lithium-ion battery
KW - Parameter identification method
KW - State of health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217438169&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.est.2025.115707
DO - 10.1016/j.est.2025.115707
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85217438169
SN - 2352-152X
VL - 114
JO - Journal of Energy Storage
JF - Journal of Energy Storage
M1 - 115707
ER -