TY - JOUR
T1 - A common protocol for reliable comparison of pollen fatty acid profiles
T2 - highlighting pitfalls and proposing a methodology for ecological research
AU - Villagómez, Gemma Nydia
AU - Brachvogel, René Chris
AU - Kárpáti, Zsolt
AU - Leonhardt, Sara D.
AU - Schmitt, Thomas
AU - Ruedenauer, Fabian A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Villagómez, Brachvogel, Kárpáti, Leonhardt, Schmitt and Ruedenauer.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Pollen is an important tissue in plants that plays a vital role in plant reproduction as it carries male gametes and occasionally also serves as a pollinator reward. There has been an increasing interest in pollen chemistry due to the impact of chemical variation on pollinator choices and well-being, especially in bees. The pollen fat content and lipid-to-protein ratio have been shown to play a crucial role in regulating pollen intake, and some bee species avoid overconsumption of fatty acids while specific pollen fatty acid ratios are essential for bee cognition. Therefore, knowledge of the fatty acid composition of plant pollen is crucial for understanding plant-pollinator interactions. However, existing methods for fatty acid analyses are not always specific to pollen fatty acids, and non-pollen-derived fatty acids can easily contaminate samples, making comparison between different methods impossible. Hence, the objectives of our study were to highlight the common mistakes and pitfalls made during pollen fatty acid extraction and analysis and propose a common protocol for reliable comparisons of pollen samples. Methods: The proposed method, developed in two different labs using different gas chromatograph/mass spectrometers and gas chromatograph/flame ionization detectors, involved manually homogenizing pollen, extracting it with chloroform:methanol (2:1), and analyzing it using gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectrometry (MS) and a flame ionization detector (FID) for identification and quantification. Results: We found that many fatty acids were present in plastic materials and many solvents commonly used in the labs, cautioning against the use of plastic and recommending blank samples to determine the level of contamination. We also suggest adding an internal standard and checking the MS and FID’s saturation limit before starting pollen homogenization. Discussion: Our proposed method generated reliable fatty acid profiles of pollen from two different plant species analyzed in the two labs, and we hope it serves as a blueprint for achieving a common methodology for characterizing and comparing pollen fatty acid profiles in ecological research.
AB - Introduction: Pollen is an important tissue in plants that plays a vital role in plant reproduction as it carries male gametes and occasionally also serves as a pollinator reward. There has been an increasing interest in pollen chemistry due to the impact of chemical variation on pollinator choices and well-being, especially in bees. The pollen fat content and lipid-to-protein ratio have been shown to play a crucial role in regulating pollen intake, and some bee species avoid overconsumption of fatty acids while specific pollen fatty acid ratios are essential for bee cognition. Therefore, knowledge of the fatty acid composition of plant pollen is crucial for understanding plant-pollinator interactions. However, existing methods for fatty acid analyses are not always specific to pollen fatty acids, and non-pollen-derived fatty acids can easily contaminate samples, making comparison between different methods impossible. Hence, the objectives of our study were to highlight the common mistakes and pitfalls made during pollen fatty acid extraction and analysis and propose a common protocol for reliable comparisons of pollen samples. Methods: The proposed method, developed in two different labs using different gas chromatograph/mass spectrometers and gas chromatograph/flame ionization detectors, involved manually homogenizing pollen, extracting it with chloroform:methanol (2:1), and analyzing it using gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectrometry (MS) and a flame ionization detector (FID) for identification and quantification. Results: We found that many fatty acids were present in plastic materials and many solvents commonly used in the labs, cautioning against the use of plastic and recommending blank samples to determine the level of contamination. We also suggest adding an internal standard and checking the MS and FID’s saturation limit before starting pollen homogenization. Discussion: Our proposed method generated reliable fatty acid profiles of pollen from two different plant species analyzed in the two labs, and we hope it serves as a blueprint for achieving a common methodology for characterizing and comparing pollen fatty acid profiles in ecological research.
KW - chemical ecology
KW - diet
KW - extraction
KW - fatty acids
KW - lipids
KW - nutrients
KW - pollination
KW - quantification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162061963&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fevo.2023.1141832
DO - 10.3389/fevo.2023.1141832
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85162061963
SN - 2296-701X
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
JF - Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
M1 - 1141832
ER -