TY - JOUR
T1 - 4D-Flow MRI and Vector Ultrasound in the In-Vitro Evaluation of Surgical Aortic Heart Valves – a Pilot Study
AU - Stephan, Henrik
AU - Grefen, Linda
AU - Clevert, Dirk
AU - Onkes, Meike
AU - Ning, Jin
AU - Thierfelder, Nikolaus
AU - Mela, Petra
AU - Hagl, Christian
AU - Curta, Adrian
AU - Grab, Maximilian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Introduction: The aim of this study was the initial investigation of 4D-Flow MRI and Vector Ultrasound as novel imaging techniques in the in-vitro analysis of hemodynamics in anatomical models. Specifically, by looking at the hemodynamic performance of state-of-the-art surgical heart valves in a 3D-printed aortic arch. Methods: The mock circulatory loop simulated physiological, pulsatile flow. Two mechanical and three biological aortic valves prostheses were compared in a 3D-printed aortic arch. 4D magnetic resonance imaging and vector flow Doppler ultrasound served as imaging methods. Hemodynamic parameters such as wall shear stress, flow velocities and pressure gradients were analyzed. Results: The flow analysis revealed characteristic flow-patterns in the 3D-printed aortic arch. The blood-flow in the arch presented complex patterns, including the formation of helixes and vortices. Higher proximal peak velocities and lower flow volumes were found for biological valves. Conclusion: The mock circulatory loop in combination with modern radiological imaging provides a sufficient basis for the hemodynamic comparison of aortic valves. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.)
AB - Introduction: The aim of this study was the initial investigation of 4D-Flow MRI and Vector Ultrasound as novel imaging techniques in the in-vitro analysis of hemodynamics in anatomical models. Specifically, by looking at the hemodynamic performance of state-of-the-art surgical heart valves in a 3D-printed aortic arch. Methods: The mock circulatory loop simulated physiological, pulsatile flow. Two mechanical and three biological aortic valves prostheses were compared in a 3D-printed aortic arch. 4D magnetic resonance imaging and vector flow Doppler ultrasound served as imaging methods. Hemodynamic parameters such as wall shear stress, flow velocities and pressure gradients were analyzed. Results: The flow analysis revealed characteristic flow-patterns in the 3D-printed aortic arch. The blood-flow in the arch presented complex patterns, including the formation of helixes and vortices. Higher proximal peak velocities and lower flow volumes were found for biological valves. Conclusion: The mock circulatory loop in combination with modern radiological imaging provides a sufficient basis for the hemodynamic comparison of aortic valves. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.)
KW - 3D-Printing
KW - 4D-MRI
KW - Surgical Heart Valve
KW - Vector Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205543848&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12265-024-10564-0
DO - 10.1007/s12265-024-10564-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85205543848
SN - 1937-5387
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
ER -