TY - JOUR
T1 - Which particles to select, and if yes, how many?
T2 - Subsampling methods for Raman microspectroscopic analysis of very small microplastic
AU - Schwaferts, Christian
AU - Schwaferts, Patrick
AU - von der Esch, Elisabeth
AU - Elsner, Martin
AU - Ivleva, Natalia P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Micro- and nanoplastic contamination is becoming a growing concern for environmental protection and food safety. Therefore, analytical techniques need to produce reliable quantification to ensure proper risk assessment. Raman microspectroscopy (RM) offers identification of single particles, but to ensure that the results are reliable, a certain number of particles has to be analyzed. For larger MP, all particles on the Raman filter can be detected, errors can be quantified, and the minimal sample size can be calculated easily by random sampling. In contrast, very small particles might not all be detected, demanding a window-based analysis of the filter. A bootstrap method is presented to provide an error quantification with confidence intervals from the available window data. In this context, different window selection schemes are evaluated and there is a clear recommendation to employ random (rather than systematically placed) window locations with many small rather than few larger windows. Ultimately, these results are united in a proposed RM measurement algorithm that computes confidence intervals on-the-fly during the analysis and, by checking whether given precision requirements are already met, automatically stops if an appropriate number of particles are identified, thus improving efficiency. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
AB - Micro- and nanoplastic contamination is becoming a growing concern for environmental protection and food safety. Therefore, analytical techniques need to produce reliable quantification to ensure proper risk assessment. Raman microspectroscopy (RM) offers identification of single particles, but to ensure that the results are reliable, a certain number of particles has to be analyzed. For larger MP, all particles on the Raman filter can be detected, errors can be quantified, and the minimal sample size can be calculated easily by random sampling. In contrast, very small particles might not all be detected, demanding a window-based analysis of the filter. A bootstrap method is presented to provide an error quantification with confidence intervals from the available window data. In this context, different window selection schemes are evaluated and there is a clear recommendation to employ random (rather than systematically placed) window locations with many small rather than few larger windows. Ultimately, these results are united in a proposed RM measurement algorithm that computes confidence intervals on-the-fly during the analysis and, by checking whether given precision requirements are already met, automatically stops if an appropriate number of particles are identified, thus improving efficiency. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
KW - Automation
KW - Bootstrap
KW - Chemometrics
KW - Microplastic
KW - Nanoplastic
KW - Raman microspectroscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105854790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00216-021-03326-3
DO - 10.1007/s00216-021-03326-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 33977363
AN - SCOPUS:85105854790
SN - 1618-2642
VL - 413
SP - 3625
EP - 3641
JO - Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
JF - Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
IS - 14
ER -