When is it good to feel bad? How sadness and fear differ in their effects on routine development

Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim, Patrick J. Oehler, Marlen Rimbeck, Matthias Spörrle, Isabell M. Welpe

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

Abstract

Introduction: This study follows recent calls to explore the emotional foundations of routine development. Routine development forms a nexus between stability and change and is thus crucial for studying organizational decision-making and organizational change. Individuals and teams going through organizational change often experience sadness and fear. Methods: We conducted a laboratory experiment with 84 teams to study the effect of sadness and fear on routine development. Results and discussion: In the sadness condition, we observed positive effects on repetitiveness, speed, reliability, and attentiveness in action. Teams experiencing fear reacted better to ‘performance traps’ in which pre-established routines are ineffective. Our findings show how the behaviors elicited by sadness and fear might ultimately affect team behavior, and therefore managerial practices.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer1141454
FachzeitschriftFrontiers in Psychology
Jahrgang14
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2023

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „When is it good to feel bad? How sadness and fear differ in their effects on routine development“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren