TY - JOUR
T1 - What can be inferred from moiré patterns? A case study of trimesic acid monolayers on graphite
AU - Spitzer, Saskia
AU - Helmle, Oliver
AU - Ochs, Oliver
AU - Horsley, Joshua
AU - Martsinovich, Natalia
AU - Heckl, Wolfgang M.
AU - Lackinger, Markus
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Self-assembly of benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (trimesic acid-TMA) monolayers at the alkanoic acid-graphite interface is revisited. Even though this archetypal model system for hydrogen bonded porous networks is particularly well studied, the analysis of routinely observed superperiodic contrast modulations known as moiré patterns lags significantly behind. Fundamental questions remain unanswered such as, are moiré periodicity and orientation always the same, i.e. is exclusively only one specific moiré pattern observed? What are the geometric relationships (superstructure matrices) between moiré, TMA, and graphite lattices? What affects the moiré pattern formation? Is there any influence from solvent, concentration, or thermal treatment? These basic questions are addressed via scanning tunneling microscopy experiments at the liquid-solid interface, revealing a variety of different moiré patterns. Interestingly, TMA and graphite lattices were always found to be ∼5° rotated with respect to each other. Consequently, the observed variation in the moiré patterns is attributed to minute deviations (<2°) from this preferred orientation. Quantitative analysis of moiré periods and orientations facilitates the determination of the TMA lattice parameter with picometer precision.
AB - Self-assembly of benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (trimesic acid-TMA) monolayers at the alkanoic acid-graphite interface is revisited. Even though this archetypal model system for hydrogen bonded porous networks is particularly well studied, the analysis of routinely observed superperiodic contrast modulations known as moiré patterns lags significantly behind. Fundamental questions remain unanswered such as, are moiré periodicity and orientation always the same, i.e. is exclusively only one specific moiré pattern observed? What are the geometric relationships (superstructure matrices) between moiré, TMA, and graphite lattices? What affects the moiré pattern formation? Is there any influence from solvent, concentration, or thermal treatment? These basic questions are addressed via scanning tunneling microscopy experiments at the liquid-solid interface, revealing a variety of different moiré patterns. Interestingly, TMA and graphite lattices were always found to be ∼5° rotated with respect to each other. Consequently, the observed variation in the moiré patterns is attributed to minute deviations (<2°) from this preferred orientation. Quantitative analysis of moiré periods and orientations facilitates the determination of the TMA lattice parameter with picometer precision.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032474985&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/c7fd00113d
DO - 10.1039/c7fd00113d
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85032474985
SN - 1359-6640
VL - 204
SP - 331
EP - 348
JO - Faraday Discussions
JF - Faraday Discussions
ER -