TY - JOUR
T1 - Update of human spinal cord reirradiation tolerance based on additional data from 38 patients
AU - Nieder, Carsten
AU - Grosu, Anca L.
AU - Andratschke, Nicolaus H.
AU - Molls, Michael
PY - 2006/12/1
Y1 - 2006/12/1
N2 - Purpose: To update a combined analysis of all published clinical data. Methods and Materials: We collected data from 38 additional patients treated in our department or published in four different reports and calculated the biologically effective dose (BED) according to the linear-quadratic model using an α/β value of 2 Gy for cervical and thoracic cord and 4 Gy for lumbar cord. In this model, a dose of 50 Gy given in single daily fractions of 2 Gy is equivalent to a BED of 100 Gy2 or 75 Gy4. Results: The 2005 risk score based on three variables (cumulative BED, highest BED of all treatment series in a particular individual, and interval), which discriminate three different risk groups, does not require modification. The low-risk group now contains 1 case of radiation myelopathy (RM) after hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation. Therefore, the rate increased from 0% to 3%. Intermediate-risk patients developed RM in 25%, and high-risk patients in 90%. When the interval between the two treatment courses is not shorter than 6 months and the dose of each course is ≤98 Gy2, the cumulative BED where no case of RM has yet been reported is 120 Gy2. Conclusions: Based on these updated results, the risk of RM appears small after ≤135.5 Gy2 when the interval is not shorter than 6 months and the dose of each course is ≤98 Gy2. We would recommend limiting the dose to the lowest feasible level. The influence of very steep dose gradients from stereotactic and intensity-modulated approaches (i.e., a more complex volume-effect) requires further evaluation.
AB - Purpose: To update a combined analysis of all published clinical data. Methods and Materials: We collected data from 38 additional patients treated in our department or published in four different reports and calculated the biologically effective dose (BED) according to the linear-quadratic model using an α/β value of 2 Gy for cervical and thoracic cord and 4 Gy for lumbar cord. In this model, a dose of 50 Gy given in single daily fractions of 2 Gy is equivalent to a BED of 100 Gy2 or 75 Gy4. Results: The 2005 risk score based on three variables (cumulative BED, highest BED of all treatment series in a particular individual, and interval), which discriminate three different risk groups, does not require modification. The low-risk group now contains 1 case of radiation myelopathy (RM) after hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation. Therefore, the rate increased from 0% to 3%. Intermediate-risk patients developed RM in 25%, and high-risk patients in 90%. When the interval between the two treatment courses is not shorter than 6 months and the dose of each course is ≤98 Gy2, the cumulative BED where no case of RM has yet been reported is 120 Gy2. Conclusions: Based on these updated results, the risk of RM appears small after ≤135.5 Gy2 when the interval is not shorter than 6 months and the dose of each course is ≤98 Gy2. We would recommend limiting the dose to the lowest feasible level. The influence of very steep dose gradients from stereotactic and intensity-modulated approaches (i.e., a more complex volume-effect) requires further evaluation.
KW - Radiation myelopathy
KW - Radiation therapy
KW - Radiation tolerance
KW - Reirradiation
KW - Spinal cord
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751192677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.1383
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.1383
M3 - Article
C2 - 17084560
AN - SCOPUS:33751192677
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 66
SP - 1446
EP - 1449
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 5
ER -