Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Tumour subregion analysis of colorectal liver metastases using semi-automated clustering based on DCE-MRI: Comparison with histological subregions and impact on pharmacokinetic parameter analysis

  • James M. Franklin
  • , Benjamin Irving
  • , Bartlomiej W. Papiez
  • , Jesper F. Kallehauge
  • , Lai Mun Wang
  • , Robert D. Goldin
  • , Adrian L. Harris
  • , Ewan M. Anderson
  • , Julia A. Schnabel
  • , Michael A. Chappell
  • , Michael Brady
  • , Ricky A. Sharma
  • , Fergus V. Gleeson
  • Bournemouth University
  • Poole Hospital
  • University of Oxford
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Imperial College London
  • Churchill Hospital
  • King's College London
  • University College London Hospitals Trust

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

8 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To use a novel segmentation methodology based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to define tumour subregions of liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC), to compare these with histology, and to use these to compare extracted pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters between tumour subregions. Materials and Methods: This ethically-approved prospective study recruited patients with CRC and ≥1 hepatic metastases scheduled for hepatic resection. Patients underwent DCE-MRI pre-metastasectomy. Histological sections of resection specimens were spatially matched to DCE-MRI acquisitions and used to define histological subregions of viable and non-viable tumour. A semi-automated voxel-wise image segmentation algorithm based on the DCE-MRI contrast-uptake curves was used to define imaging subregions of viable and non-viable tumour. Overlap of histologically-defined and imaging subregions was compared using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). DCE-MRI PK parameters were compared for the whole tumour and histology-defined and imaging-derived subregions. Results: Fourteen patients were included in the analysis. Direct histological comparison with imaging was possible in nine patients. Mean DSC for viable tumour subregions defined by imaging and histology was 0.738 (range 0.540-0.930). There were significant differences between Ktrans and kep for viable and non-viable subregions (p < 0.001) and between whole lesions and viable subregions (p < 0.001). Conclusion: We demonstrate good concordance of viable tumour segmentation based on pre-operative DCE-MRI with a post-operative histological gold-standard. This can be used to extract viable tumour-specific values from quantitative image analysis, and could improve treatment response assessment in clinical practice.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer108934
FachzeitschriftEuropean Journal of Radiology
Jahrgang126
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Mai 2020
Extern publiziertJa

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Tumour subregion analysis of colorectal liver metastases using semi-automated clustering based on DCE-MRI: Comparison with histological subregions and impact on pharmacokinetic parameter analysis“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren